from Gloria TV
Fr.Hesse's conclusion on Vatican Council II, EENS and the Nicene Creed is irrational, non traditional and heretical
The three errors of the Feeneyites
Fr. Francois Laisney
_____________________________________________________________________
JULY 27, 2017
Fr.Hesse's conclusion on Vatican Council II, EENS and the Nicene Creed is irrational, non traditional and heretical
About the so called "Second Vatican Council":
Sanctus Bonifatius the German traditionalist from Germany cites Fr. Hesse's videos on Gloria TV.However when I pointed out that Fr. Hesse was using an irrational premise and so Vatican Council II was a rupture with Tradition and in particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), he removed the comments.
Like Fr.Francois Laisney and Fr.J.Pfieffer,Fr.Hesse assumes the baptism of desire(BOD), Baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance (I.I) refer not to hypothetical cases but known people saved outside the Church. There are no such people. So he concludes that Vatican Council II is rupture with Tradition. It is a false Council for him.This is his false inference. His conclusion on Vatican Council II, EENS and the Nicene Creed then emerge as heretical.
I interpret Vatican Council II without this false premise and my conclusion is different.
These traditionalist priests assume that people saved with BOD, BOB and I.I are not only known to God but also to man. So they can infer that BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to the dogma EENS.
This is the objective error on the SSPX website.
If they realise that the magisterium made an error during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII then Fr. Hesse would not be able to say that Vatican Council II is a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Tradition.
So the fault lies with Fr.Hesse.
He has overlooked an error made by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops.-Lionel Andrades
JULY 26, 2017
SSPX supporter in Germany pulls down comments :objective error on SSPX official website
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment