It is a week and no FSSP priest denies what I have written : TLM with manifest mortal sin for politically correct reasons
SATURDAY, JULY 1, 2017
Solemn Tridentine Rite Mass tomorrow with manifest sacrilege
Last Saturday I wrote on this blog that on Sunday morning(July 2, 2017) there will be a solemn Tridentine Rite Mass at 11 a.m at the church Santissima Trinita dei Pelligrini, Rome which an FSSP priest will offer.The FSSP do not deny , that they will offer the Mass as follows.
1.For the priest, the Mass will be offered in which they will change the understanding of the Nicene Creed. For the three FSSP priests it will mean, 'I believe in three known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins,they are the baptisms of desire, blood and invincible ignorance, all without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.So I do not believe in one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins, the baptism of water'.
There is no denial here from the FSSP on this point.They agree with me.This is public heresy.
They will not tell me that they disagree with me and that I am wrong, since they want to be politically correct with the leftist magisterium of the Church.They will continue to proclaim and teach error.
It is week since I wrote that piece and e-mailed it to the FSSP priests in Rome and elsewhere.1 No comment. No denial.Since what I have said is the truth.For personal reasons they have to change the Nicene Creed and also teach the error to young people in Catechism classes. This is being politically correct with the Left and the two popes. For the last 10 years or more Fr.Joseph Kramer, the Australian Parish Priest at Santissima dei Pellegrini has been denying the Catholic Faith and considers it a virtue.This is how they offer the Tridentine Rite Mass.
2.They will change the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) to mean outside the Church there is salvation, there is known salvation.This includes invisible cases of the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, all being not invisible but visible.Since they are physically visible there is salvation outside the Church. So the dogma EENS according to the 16th century magisterium has been changed.
There is no denial here from Fr.Joseph Kramer the Parish Priest.He agrees with me.He will change the meaning of the Nicene Creed and the dogma EENS and offer Mass. This will be public mortal sin. Even after being informed over the years he will go ahead with no repentance.This would be sacrilege.The Eucharist would be valid but the priest will be offering it sacrilegiously.The congregation will be in ignorance.
See. Here too there is no denial. The FSSP priests agree with me. They are in manifest mortal sin. But to be able to offer the Tridentine Rite Mass or Mass in Italian they have to continue with this first class heresy.
3.At this church tomorrow the priests will interpret Vatican Council II with all references to hypothetical cases being explicitly known in 2017.How can theoretical cases be objectively known in 2017? Who can see someone saved with the 'seeds of the Word' and without the baptism of water? So LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc will all refer to not theoretical cases but practical exceptions to EENS.Then the FSSP priests will say that in Vatican Council II these are references to personally known cases, and so they are examples of salvation outside the Church.Vatican Council II will be a rupture with Tradition( EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).For the FSSP there are known cases of non Catholics saved ,without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7), as if they would know.
Again as over the years there has been no denial from them on this point.
This is first class heresy and an impediment to offering Holy Mass. This a mortal sin of faith.A lay member of the congregation must challenge it canonically.Since the priests are not going to do anything about this.They are concerned about their careers.In obedience they will also accept and follow heresy.
Their heresy in this case, is based on an irrational premise( invisible baptism of desire is visible) and non traditional conclusion ( invisible baptism of desire is a visible exception to EENS, so Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition).
This is an objective error.It is a fact of life that we cannot know of any exception to EENS in real life.There cannot br any practical exception.Who among us can say that someone on earth will be saved with the baptism of desire and without the baptism of water, or someone is in Heaven without the baptism of water? No one.
The FSSP priests may say that their position is magisterial but it still is an objective error even if it is supported by the two living popes. The popes are violating the Principle of Non Contradiction.
These are mortal sins of faith I repeat and those who attend Mass at this FSSP church should be informed about the exact reason, why the FSSP priests in Rome:
1. Have a non traditional understanding of the Nicene Creed.
2. Interpret the dogma EENS as a rupture with the understanding of the dogma in the past, example, in the 16th century.They use an irrational premise to interpret Vatican Council II and the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance and then infer that there is a rupture with EENS.
3.They do not interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS without the irrational premise; without assuming invisible cases are visible.Nor do they demand that the magisterium does the same.
The congregation should be told that the magisterium has violated the Principle of Non Contradiction and has made an objective mistake and the FSSP priests are following it so that they are not suspended or transferred, even though they know it is a mortal sin.
In their catechism and other religious programs they do not educate the congregation with the truth instead they promote the official, politically correct with the Left theology that creates new doctrines,which they accept, while they offer the old Mass.
There is no comment, as expected, from anyone, to defend the FSSP priests.
None of the FSSP priests are going to say,"Lionel, you are correct.Vatican Council II and EENS, Cushingite is irrational.So it is a rupture with Tradition because of the false premise.From today we will interpret Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and EENS with Feeneyite theology.It is rational and traditional. It is not a rupture with Tradition.'
Some ten years back the FSSP priests in Rome were not even willing to give their contact address to explain Dominus Iesus and the CDF Notification of Fr. Jacques Dupuis s.j in harmony with the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II(AG 7, LG 14).