Read the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally it does not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : most Catholics have it wrong

If you read the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally there is nothing in it to contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Yet most Catholics do not read it rationally.So there is a 'development' of the dogma EENS for them.But there really is no 'development' in Vatican Council II or the Catechism to contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the missionaries and magisterium of the 16th century.

DO NOT ASSUME HYPOTHETICAL CASES IN THE CATECHISM ARE EXPLICIT AND OBJECTIVE

This means when you read the Catechism of the Catholic Church do not assume hypothetical cases are explicit .Do not infer that they are known examples of salvation outside the Church.There are no such cases in real life.Also theoretical references  are not actual people in 2017.So the following references being hypothetical are not exceptions or relevant to the dogma EENS as it was interpreted traditionally by Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

EXAMPLES OF HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCES IN THE CATECHISM

1. 'God is not limited to the Sacraments'(CCC 1257)

'2.all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body'(CCC 846).

3. Those 'justified by faith in Baptism are incorporated into Christ; they therefore have a right to be called Christians'(CCC 818).

4. They are 'joined in many ways to the baptized who are honored by the name of Christian, but do not profess the Catholic faith in its entirety or have not preserved unity or communion under the successor of Peter."(CCC 838).

5. 'the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims'(CCC 841).

HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCES IN MYSTICI CORPORIS AND CATECHISMS ARE SIMPLY HYPOTHETICAL ONLY

Similarly references  to invisible for us baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) in Mystici Corporis, the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X etc are not visible in real life.They cannot be known exceptions to the dogma EENS as it was known to Fr. Leonard Feenet and the St. Benedict Centers mentioned in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.So there  really is no known salvation outside the Church mentioned by the popes and saints over the centuries.

BOD, BOB AND I.I ARE ALWAYS HYPOTHETICAL

They were always referring to hypothetical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and so knew that theoretical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I cannot be objective at the same time.So BOD, BOB and I.I were irrelevant to the dogma EENS as it was defined by the three Church Councils.

LIBERAL THEOLOGIANS MIXED UP KNOWN AND UNKNOWN, VISIBLE AND INVISIBLE CASES

It was the liberal theologians who have re-interpreted the popes and saints and assumed that what is unknown and invisible was really visible and known. This was the reasoning also at Vatican Council II. This was also the reasoning when Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger put together the Catechism of the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades