The SSPX bishops still do not realize that when the General Chapter Statement affirmed outside the Church there is no salvation with no possible exceptions the Statement was saying that there are no possibile exceptions to Feeneyite EENS in Vatican Council II.
Here it is:
we reaffirm our faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the unique Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation nor possibility to find the means leading to salvation 1
Here lies the SSPX's strong point, nay,clinching point in any negotiations with the Vatican, for canonical status.But the SSPX bishops do not know about this.
Probably only the prayers of the faithful will bring the grace to allow this point to 'sink in'.
The General Chapter Statement affirmed Feeneyite EENS.Bishop Fellay does not!
He affirms EENS according to the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
When Bishop Fellay affirms EENS according to the General Chapter Statement 2012 he will not be affirming EENS according to the 1949 Holy Office or Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston at that time.
When Bishop Fellay affirms EENS according to the General Chapter Statement he will not be affirming Vatican Council II according to Cardinals Kasper and Koch and the two popes.
He will be obliging Cardinal Burke to affirm Vatican Council II without LG 16 etc referring to a visible and known exception to Feeneyite EENS. Presently for Cardinal Burke, LG 16,UR 3 etc are a rupture with EENS.
For him the Council is a rupture with Tradition.There is a break with EENS according to the missionaries and magisterium of the 16th century.There is a rupture with the past ecclesiology which had its foundation in EENS(Feeneyite/16th century).
Now when the SSPX agrees formally that they affirm EENS according to the General Chapter Statement which says there are no possibile exceptions to salvation outside the Church they would have changed their perspective.They would be saying the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), past or present, refer to theoretical speculation, possibilities known only to God.They are not actual people in the present times saved outside the Church.There is no rupture with Tradition.
So when the Catechism of Pope Pius X mentions invincible ignorance it is not a rupture with Feeneyite EENS.
When the Baltimore Catechism mentions the baptism of desire it is not a rupture with Feeneyite EENS. Even though for the CDF/Ecclesia Dei it is !
The Vatican(CDF/Ecclesia Dei) has rejected the SSPX General Chapter Statement and will continue to do so.But in that statement lies a secret.
The secret, I repeat, is : there are no exceptions to EENS mentioned in Vatican Council II, since probabilities cannot be practical exceptions to the dogma EENS which says there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
So the SSPX Statement 2012 affirms outside of which there is no salvation nor possibility to find the means leading to salvation.There are none men mentioned in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(19949.For liberals who understand what I am saying, this could be frightening.Those who discern would understand the implications.
It's a complete somersault on Vatican Council II.
The game has changed.The rules have changed.-Lionel Andrades
1.
http://archives.sspx.org/superior_generals_news/2012_general_chapter/2012_general_chapter_statement_7-19-2012.htm
October 3, 2017
Simple way for the SSPX to show Card.Burke that they are not in schism
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment