The Vatican should apologize for the excommunication of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr.Leonard Feeney.Since we now know that they both were doctrinally correct.Invisible for us baptism of desire,baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance cannot be visible exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).There are no practical exceptions to EENS in 2017.
Similarly Lumen Gentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2 etc in Vatican Council II are not known cases of someone saved outside the Church.So Vatican Council II is not a rupture with EENS(Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of Tradition.Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of continuity with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.Pre and post Vatican Council II exclusivist ecclesiology is the same.
The popes since Pius XII however made a mistake.New doctrines were created with hypothetical cases mistaken for being objective exceptions, to the centuries old interpretation of EENS.
So there was a new EENS with BOD, BOB and I.I being exceptions (Letter of the Holy Office 1949).Until today officially there is still a Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium 16(invincible ignorance) being a visible and known case of someone saved outside the Church.This is false.There is no such known person.
There are no no known cases of the baptism of desire etc which are exceptions to the dogma EENS said Fr. Stefano Visintin osb, Rector of the University of St. Anselm, Rome.He is an an Italian scientist and Benedictine priest. He reminds me of the late Fr.Stanley Jaki, also a Benedictine priest and scientist.What Fr.Stefano is saying is no rocket science.It is common sense that invisible cases of the baptism of desire etc cannot be visible exceptions to all needing to be incorporated into the Church for salvation with no exceptions(EENS).
Last year Pope Benedict in a public mistake announced that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.He stated in the daily Avvenire that there was a development with Vatican Council II.
Pope Benedict has also stated that the SSPX has no canonical status until 'the doctrinal issue' is settled.He meant that they have to affirm Vatican Council II with LG 16 etc being visible and known. So the Council then becomes a rupture with EENS and the rest of Tradition.This is acceptable doctrine for him.
With the new salvation doctrine, based on invisible and hypothetical cases being objective and exceptions to all needing 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, LG 14) in the Catholic Church for salvation,Pope Benedict has also changed our understanding of the Nicene Creed.With the new doctrine(only those who know need to enter the Church and not every one in general) based on the new theology(outside the Church there is known salvation) whose foundation is a philosophical error( invisible people are visible) he has also put away the Athanasius Creed.It states outside the Church there is no salvation.
This is all a first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II.The meaning of the Nicene Creed cannot be changed.
Pope John Paul II however, also overlooked this error in the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment