Brother Andre Marie MICM and a priest of the Institute of Christ the King do not mention Vatican Council II being in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Brother Andre Marie MICM  has written an article on extra ecclesiam nulla salus after a very long time and again there is no mention of Vatican Council II.1

He recommends the video of a priest of the Institute of Christ the King.The priest also does not mention Vatican Council II being in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

The Superiors at the St. Benedict Centers, at Still River and Richmond, N.H have been recognized by the Church and they are not affirming Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS. Instead they are allowing Vatican Council II to be seen as a rupture with Tradition and this is acceptable for the bishops in New England...2

Neither does the priest of the traditionalist Institute of Christ the King nor Brother Andre Marie and the St.Benedict Centers, state, that Vatican Council II is not a development with EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century. Instead they agree with Pope Benedict. Vatican Council II is a rupture with EENS.Of course only with the use of the false premise, which Pope Benedcit encouraged in theology.

Communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA when they interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary,St.Benedict Center, Still River which last month was given granted canonical status negate the dogma EENS( Feeneyite) with Vatican Council II interpreted with the premise.
The communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA are denying the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was interpreted over the centuries.When they interpret Vatican Council II, with the irrational premise then the Council is a rupture with the dogam extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to Fr. Leonard Feeney. 3

Instead Brother Andre Marie and the traditionalist priest could have said that Vatican Council II is Feeneyite. It is in line with EENS as it was interpreted in the 16th century. So Pope Benedict was wrong. 

If they announce LG 16( invincible ignorance), LG 14( baptism, of desire) etc refer to hypothetical cases only their bishops will not be pleased.For then Vatican Council II will not be ' a development' .

So by omitting the subject of Vatican Council II in his article, Brother Andre Marie  is telling his bishop, the two popes, the cardinals and the Jewish Left, that he rejects the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church just  as they do.He does not interpret LG 16 as referring to invisible people in 2017.So he supports the new ecclesiology which is s rupture with the Syllabus of Errors on ecumenism and non Christian religions.

-Lionel Andrades

1

Religious Pluralism is Evil by Brother Andre Marie MICM   http://catholicism.org/ad-rem-no-304.html

2.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/superiors-at-st-benedict-centers-still.html

3.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/repost-communities-of-frleonard-feeney.html

Religious Pluralism is Evil by Brother Andre Marie MICM   http://catholicism.org/ad-rem-no-304.html