Charles Coulombe could not see that Pope Benedict was trying to protect his error.

Pope Benedict said (Video 2:35) 'If there is salvation outside the Church then there is no need to evangelize and there is no need to be a Catholic, that is the logical conclusion,the path speculative theology has taken into the Church...and this has become the view of everybody since Vatican Council II.'-Charles Coulombe 1

By giving the up the Church's necessity for salvation, the Council sparked a "double crisis"

"Double crisis" of Church and Faith

Thus, with the fact that the Second Vatican Council has "definitely" abandoned the belief that there is no salvation for unbaptized, the Church and the faith had fallen into a "double crisis".

"On the one hand it seems to withdraw any motivation a future missionary commitment. Why convince people of accepting the Christian faith, even if they can be saved without it?
But for Christians, the question on the necessity of faith and manner of life was uncertain and problematic. If there are those who can be saved in other ways, it is ultimately not evident why the Christian should be linked to the need of the Christian faith and its morals. But if the faith and salvation are not dependent on each other, the faith is also groundless.
Recently, various attempts have been made ​​to bring to reconciliation the universal need of the Christian faith with the opportunity to save oneself without them."

http://eponymousflower.blogspot.it/2016/03/pope-benedict-breaks-silence-and.html

The Secret is out.Pope Benedict had made a theological mistake at Vatican Council II and spent the rest of his life trying to protect it as the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and then as Pope Benedict XVI.This report above on March 16,2016 could have been his last attempt to prop his and Rahner's new theology.It was based upon visible for us baptism of desire.

Charles Coulombe has not caught on.Since Coulombe rejects the baptism of desire theologically but infers, when reading Vatican Council II, that the baptism of desire refers to physically visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is also the reasoning of Pope Benedict and the liberal theologians.

So Charles Coulombe could not see that Pope Benedict was trying to protect his error.
If Pope Benedict wanted, he could have interpreted Vatican Council II and EENS like me. He could have said that there are no physically known,objectively visible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance.These hypothetical cases are not objective. So they are not exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
Similarly LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc are also not physically visible people, saved outside the Church. So being invisible cases, hypothetical and theoretical cases for us, they are not exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. Vatican Council II does not state that there is known salvation outside the Church.The inference has to be made. This inference is false.
So without this false inference Vatican Council II is in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by the missionaries in the 16th century.Pope Benedict made a mistake.-Lionel Andrades

1
The Truth about Fr. Feeney (SPECIAL UNCUT EDITION)