The traditionalists are blocking the reconciliation of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) with the CDF/Ecclesia Dei since the bloggers are unable to affirm Feeneyte extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),which is central to the doctrinal crisis in the Catholic Church.

The traditionalists are blocking the reconciliation of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) with the CDF/Ecclesia Dei  since the bloggers are unable to affirm Feeneyte extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),which is central to the doctrinal crisis in the Catholic Church.

The SSPX General Chapter Statement(2012) affirmed Feeneyite EENS so Bishop Bernard Fellay, the Superior General of the SSPX must continue doctrinal discussions on Vatican Council II while endorsing EENS( Feeneyite).

This means the SSPX official website is wrong when it suggests that unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS in reality.BOD,BOB and I.I had nothing to do with EENS.The liberal theologians made the false connection. Also Mystici Corporis etc do not state that BOD, BOB and I.I are personally known people saved outside the Church. The theologians made this false inferene.Also possibilties of salvation in the past are always hypothetical cases.There is no known St. Emerentiana or the Good Thief on the Cross in 2017.No one could have seen St. Emerentiana or St. Victor in Heaven with the baptism of desire and without the baptism of water.So if they could not been seen, if they were invisible cases in Heaven, then how could they be known exceptions to EENS at that time or for the present times (2017-2018)? The magiseterium and Archbiship Lefebvre made a mistake.

This is also the false understanding of EENS held today by traditionalists faithful to Archbishop Lefebvre and so the SSPX cannot demand for canonical status based on sound Catolic doctrine which neither they nor the CDF/Ecclesia Dei hold at present.

I affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and they can do the same.

Instead they could tell the CDF/Ecclesia Dei , the German bishops and the liberals that they still, like me, reject Vatican Council II(Cushingite). They also reject EENS (Cushingite).

They can tell the two popes to please switch to Vatican Council II( Feeneyite).

Tell the two popes that LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, GS 22, NA 2 etc are not exceptions to Feeneyite EENS, for them.

So where is the doctrinal block for the SSPX getting canonical status? There is none.The Vatican has not corrected the reports on this blog.There is no denial. The SSPX can affirm Vatican Council II and EENS Feeneyite and expect canonical status, if the demand still is to only accept Vatican Council II. In fact all religious communities in the Catholic Church can do the same.

They must avoid the approach of the St. Benedict Center, Still River, MA,USA which recently got canonical status by affirming Vatican Council II(Cushingite) which is a rupture with Feeneyite(EENS).Affirm Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) and EENS( Feeneyite).Even the St.Benedict Center, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Richmond, N.H, traditionalists can do the same ask for canonical status.

Why don't the traditionalist bloggers help the SSPX by endorsing EENS Feeneyite and ask the SSPX priests  whom they know to do the same.

They would still be affirming the Nicene Creed, Vatican Council II, EENS and all the Catechisms but doings o rationally , without the unknown people are known exceptions to EENS in 2017-2018 theory.

-Lionel Andrades