There is an objective mistake in both Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.The two popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith have not corrected the error.So theologically and doctrinally the popes and bishops have no right to evaluate Marian apparitions in Medugorje, Brazil etc.
MAGISTERIUM VIOLATES PRINCIPLE OF NON CONTRADICTION
Theologically and doctrinally they cannot check the apparitions since the magisterium is in error and violates the Principle of Non Contradiction with innovative philosophy and non traditional theology.
Due to magisterial heresy Our Lady would have to support theological errors or be opposed by the Vatican.
FALSE THEOLOGY IS OFFICIAL
FALSE THEOLOGY IS OFFICIAL
The false theology is being taught in the parishes, seminaries and Catholic universities and was approved by Cardinal Ratzinger and Fr. Rahner.It is not Catholic.The error came into the Church during the Fr. Leonard Feeney case and has influenced Vatican Council II.
Now after some 50 years we know that invisible for us baptism of desire (BOD) cannot be a visible exception to EENS.So the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is the same as it was for the missionaries in the 16th century. So in March 2016 Pope Benedict was wrong. But Our Lady at Medugorje cannot affirm the strict interpretation of EENS since this is rejected by the two popes.
She has been careful to stay out of controversy and so the apparitions have not been banned.
In March 2016 Pope Benedict could have said that Vatican Council II is not a development with EENS, since hypothetical cases of LG 14 etc cannot be exceptions to EENS.
PROBABLY THERE WAS NO PERMISSION FROM THE MASONS
He did not say this for fear of the Masons, probably.He had the choice. He could have said there was no rupture with the old ecclesiology.He did not say that EENS was the same as it was for the missionaries and magisterium in the 16th century.Instead he affirmed public heresy.He said that EENS today was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century. So there was a break with the authentic magisterium of the past.There is a new version. He admited it in public. Now Marian apparitions have to repeat this heresy otherwise Our Lady would not be able to continue her pastoral work.
EVEN TRADITIONALISTS AND SEDEVACANTISTS SUPPORT OFFICIAL ERROR.
Even the traditionalists and sedevacantists reject the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, they critically call it Feeneyite.Since they believe invisible cases of BOD are visible and known exceptions to EENS. So they are examples of salvation outside the Church. For Pope Benedict and the traditionalists, possibilities from the past are living exceptions in the present to EENS.This is being rational for them.
PROBABLY THERE WAS NO PERMISSION FROM THE MASONS
He did not say this for fear of the Masons, probably.He had the choice. He could have said there was no rupture with the old ecclesiology.He did not say that EENS was the same as it was for the missionaries and magisterium in the 16th century.Instead he affirmed public heresy.He said that EENS today was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century. So there was a break with the authentic magisterium of the past.There is a new version. He admited it in public. Now Marian apparitions have to repeat this heresy otherwise Our Lady would not be able to continue her pastoral work.
EVEN TRADITIONALISTS AND SEDEVACANTISTS SUPPORT OFFICIAL ERROR.
Even the traditionalists and sedevacantists reject the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, they critically call it Feeneyite.Since they believe invisible cases of BOD are visible and known exceptions to EENS. So they are examples of salvation outside the Church. For Pope Benedict and the traditionalists, possibilities from the past are living exceptions in the present to EENS.This is being rational for them.
MARCH 2016 HERESY
Pope Benedict said that there was a development with Vatican Council II.He meant that Vatican Council II was a rupture with EENS. It was a rupture for him since LG 16 etc referred to visible people saved outside the Church. It referred to known people saved in invincible ignorance.If it was not known or visible it could not be a rupture.
OUR LADY CANNOT CORRECT THE ERROR OF THE POPES
Pope Benedict said that there was a development with Vatican Council II.He meant that Vatican Council II was a rupture with EENS. It was a rupture for him since LG 16 etc referred to visible people saved outside the Church. It referred to known people saved in invincible ignorance.If it was not known or visible it could not be a rupture.
OUR LADY CANNOT CORRECT THE ERROR OF THE POPES
Now if Our Lady would say that this is not true. Cases of BOD would only be known to God and that for us humans there are no visible cases, she would be affirming the dogma EENS.She would also be correcting the heretical statement of Pope Benedict in Avvenire in March 2016.But this would be the end of the apparitions.The CDF would end them for theological and doctrinal errors.
POPE PROMOTES HIS NEW THEOLOGY BASED UPON AN IRRATIONALITY
Pope Benedict himself did not state that there were no known cases of salvation outside the Church and so the call to mission has not ended. Instead he finged and asked why was mission necessary when there was the possibility of salvation( a possibility is an exception to EENS for him) outside the Church?.He was subtly promoting his new theology which is based on the irrationality of invisible people being invisible.
Now Our Lady cannot contradict him.
Pope Benedict himself did not state that there were no known cases of salvation outside the Church and so the call to mission has not ended. Instead he finged and asked why was mission necessary when there was the possibility of salvation( a possibility is an exception to EENS for him) outside the Church?.He was subtly promoting his new theology which is based on the irrationality of invisible people being invisible.
Now Our Lady cannot contradict him.
PEDRO REGIS SILENCED BY NEW BISHOP
In Brazil, Our Lady told the seer Pedro Regis that there is salvation in only the Catholic Church.Outside the Church there is no salvation.
In Brazil, Our Lady told the seer Pedro Regis that there is salvation in only the Catholic Church.Outside the Church there is no salvation.
Pedro Regis has been silenced by his bishop it is reported.
Our Lady told a visionary( I do not remember the name) that a time will come when only those who follow her apparitions and messages will be saved.-Lionel Andrades
.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment