APRIL 12, 2017
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 teaches anathema contradicts Jesus' teaching in John 3:5 and the Council of Trent
OCTOBER 13, 2016
An error was made in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and much of the Vatican Council II theology is based on this error.This is what I know
JANUARY 18, 2016
Archbishop Lefebvre did not see the same wrong reasoning, as the inference in the Letter(1949) used in Vatican Council II.The SSPX has still not noticed this !!!
JANUARY 7, 2016
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 : from meaningless non applicable theology to heresy
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/letter-of-holy-office-1949-from.html
DECEMBER 30, 2015
The Letter made a mistake. Archbishop Lefebvre did not notice it.
DECEMBER 30, 2015
The Letter made a mistake. Archbishop Lefebvre did not notice it.
MARCH 14, 2015
After 1949 the error came in a big way into the Catholic Church
Traditionalists reject Vatican Council II with heresy and accept the Letter of the Holy Office with heresy. They do not see how the two are connected
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/traditionalists-reject-vatican-council.html#links
FEBRUARY 13, 2015ù
Bishop Schneider uses the common Gnostic interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/bishop-schneider-uses-common-gnostic.html
FEBRUARY 13, 2015
In itself the baptism of desire is not a problem. It is when it is considered an exception to the dogma that the error arises
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/in-itself-baptism-of-desire-is-not.html
The baptism of desire is accepted by me since it is not an exception to the dogma even when it occurs and it is known only to God http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/the-baptism-of-desire-is-accepted-by-me.html
The lawful authorities were saying that there were exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/i-have-received-e-mail-today.html
JULY 28, 2017
So objectively there were no exceptions to Feeneyite EENS and the so Letter of the Holy Office was a classic 'oops'.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/so-objectively-there-were-no-exceptions.html
SEPTEMBER 13, 2017
Lay Catholics must reject the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office conclusion : expedient religious are teaching it in Catechism classes
APRIL 12, 2017
Let Holy Office 1949 and the Archbishop of Boston be anathema?They were teaching heresy. There are no known cases of the baptism of desire and they postulated exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/let-holy-office-1949-and-archbishop-of.html
JANUARY 25, 2017
Cardinal Richard Cushing and Nostra Aetate picked up the objective error from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/01/cardinal-richard-cushing-and-nostra.html
OCTOBER 10, 2016
The Letter of the Holy Office says that it is not required that a person be incorporated into the Church as a member for salvation while the Catechism of Pius X says it is necessary.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/the-letter-of-holy-office-says-that-it.html
OCTOBER 2, 2016
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston contradicts the Catechism of Pope Pius X
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/letter-of-holy-office-1949-to.html
MAY 6, 2015
Did the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 make a factual mistake and so school children in the Archdiocese of Detroit have to use an irrationality to interpret Vatican Council II ?
MAY 6, 2015
Did the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 make a factual mistake and so school children in the Archdiocese of Detroit have to use an irrationality to interpret Vatican Council II ?
Questions and Answers : Did the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 make a factual mistake ? http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-did-letter-of.html
MARCH 6, 2015
Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict also used the false premise and conclusion from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/pope-john-paul-ii-and-pope-benedict.html
MARCH 2, 2015
The Council of Trent, Mystici Corporis no where says that these cases are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : Rome made a mistake in 1949
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/the-council-of-trent-mystici-corporis.html
FEBRUARY 28, 2015
FEBRUARY 28, 2015
Parts of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and the Catechism of the Catholic Church do affirm the dogma according to Fr.Leonard Feeney http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/parts-of-letter-of-holy-office-1949-and.html
Did Pope Pius XII make a mistake ? : implicit desire, invincible ignorance have nothing to do with extra ecclesiam nulla salus http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/did-pope-pius-xii-make-mistake-implicit.html
From Pope Pius XII to Pope Francis they all have been using an irrational premise in the interpretation of magisterial texts
SSPX District Superior Italy makes the same factual error as Muller, Ladaria, Di Noi, Pozzo, Kaspar and Koch
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/sspx-district-superior-italy-makes-same.html#links
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/sspx-district-superior-italy-makes-same.html#links
Will Archbishop Augustine Di Noia acknowledge he made an error? http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/will-archbishop-augustine-di-noia.html
Continued
Continued
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment