Franciscans of the Immaculate can go ahead and affirm Vatican Council II like me

So both groups of the Franciscans of the Immaculate are making a doctrinal error on Vatican Council II. 1 It depends upon how they see the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).Is it physically visible or invisible for them?

This is the decider.

Presently both groups of the F.I see BOD, BOB and I.I as being visible.This is irrational.Yet this is the philosophical position of Cardinal Braz de Avez and Fr. Stefano Mannelli,F.I.

I am sorry to have to point it out.I respect both of them.But someone has got to say this. And no one else is doing so.

This is a community I have been close to for some 16 years and I am not ready to fall back easily.

Both groups can interpret Vatican Council II without the Ladaria Error( LG 8 is a visible case and so an exception to traditional EENS),without the false premise(invisible people are visible on earth),without Cushingism(hypothetical cases are non hypothetical) and Vatican Council II will then have the hermeneutic of continuity with the past.

So they can affirm Vatican Council II, premise-free and Feeneyite, with the hermeneutic of continuity with the past.
They may or may not want to acknowledge that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, an inter office letter between bishops, made an objective mistake.The Letter sees BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to known people saved outside the Church.The same mistake was made at Vatican Council II by some of the cardinals.
Now the Franciscans of the Immaculate have Vatican Council II before them and they know that Pope Francis permits the Traditional Latin Mass to be offered in the Church.So they can go ahead and affirm Vatican Council II like me.
The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate have already clarified for the local newspapers that they do not reject Vatican Council II but interpret the Council without the Rahnerian theology.They do not interpret the Council like the secular newspapers in Italy.
So they affirm Vatican Council II. This is positive.

Now go ahead and announce that you affirm Vatican Council II like the lay man Lionel Andrades.


BOB,BOB and I.I are not explicit for him.This is the difference between him and everyone else.
Since BOD,BOB and I.I are not objective cases in 2018 they are not relevant to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the old ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, for me.
So BOD, BOB and I.I are not rejected, instead are accepted as only hypothetical cases .They can only be hypothetical cases for us human beings.
This is rational, logical, traditional and non heretical.
It can be affirmed by members of the Catholic Charismatic  Renewal Movement, Focolares and the Neo Catehecumenal Way of Kiko Arguello.

All the religious communities(Dominicans, Carmelities, Redemptorists), the Vatican Curia and traditionalists can accept it.
-Lionel Andrades

1.

MARCH 21, 2018

Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate must announce immediately that they affirm Vatican Council II without the Ladaria Error and in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church and the Syllabus of Errors

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/franciscan-sisters-of-immaculate-must.html



 

Why is Cardinal Braz de Avez imposing the Ladaria Error on the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Mannelli Family ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/why-is-cardinal-braz-de-avez-imposing.html