Bishop Donald Sanborn and Fr.Anthonty Cekada agree with me Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Tradition!
Also Bishop Mark Pivarunas agrees with me.There is a mistake on the CMRI website.The Sylabus of Errors, Quanta Cura,Mystici Corporis etc are not contradicted by Vatican Council II.Neither does Mystici Corporis etc contradict the the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).They have not objected to me mentioning all this on my blog Eucharist and Mission.
Similarly Peter and Michael Dimond realize that Vatican Council II(LG 16, LG 8, etc) does not contradict the dogma EENS.They made the common mistake.They are presenting any counter arguement or defending themselves.
Also Bishop Mark Pivarunas agrees with me.There is a mistake on the CMRI website.The Sylabus of Errors, Quanta Cura,Mystici Corporis etc are not contradicted by Vatican Council II.Neither does Mystici Corporis etc contradict the the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).They have not objected to me mentioning all this on my blog Eucharist and Mission.
Similarly Peter and Michael Dimond realize that Vatican Council II(LG 16, LG 8, etc) does not contradict the dogma EENS.They made the common mistake.They are presenting any counter arguement or defending themselves.
Since 2013 I had written to Peter and Michael Dimond but they could not understand me.They rejected the baptism of desire but in their mind they pictured it as a known person.Since it is a known person, someone physically visible, it would be an exception to the dogma EENS.Since there cannot be exceptions to the dogma EENS they rejected visible for them BOD.
For me BOD is invisible and so I do not have a problem with it with reference to EENS. It does not have to be BOD or EENS. I do not have to choose.
For me BOD is invisible and so I do not have a problem with it with reference to EENS. It does not have to be BOD or EENS. I do not have to choose.
So Vatican Council II is no more a reason for the sedevacantists to remain in sedevacantism.-Lionel Andrades
March 14, 2018
March 14, 2018
Without the theological error of the two popes, without the Ladaria Error, theologically, sedevacantists no more have reason to remain in sedevacantism because of Vatican Council II? http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/without-theological-error-of-two-popes.html
Wednesday, March 14, 2018
We simply need a prelate, religious congregation or lay movement to announce that they choose to interpret Vatican Council II without the irrational premise: we need a cardinal to announcement what the CDF does not http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/we-simply-need-prelate-religious.html
March 14, 2018
The sedevacantists MHFM interpret Vatican Council II with an irrationality and then reject the Council.This is heretical. They make the same theological error as the Vatican Curia.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/the-mhfm-website-interprets-vatican.html
Wednesday, March 14, 2018
The sedevacantists MHFM interpret Vatican Council II with an irrationality and then reject the Council.This is heretical. They make the same theological error as the Vatican Curia.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/the-mhfm-website-interprets-vatican.html
Wednesday, March 14, 2018
CMRI website says Vatican Council II contradicts Syllabus of Errors. This is false.http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/cmri-website-says-vatican-council-ii.html
March 14, 2018
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/its-time-for-us-sedevacantists-to.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment