CMTV could announce that they affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS with hypothetical for us BOD, BOB and I.I in harmony with Vatican Council II and the Catechism(1994)

I don't know what is keeping Michael Voris and the CMTV Staff from affirming the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) along with hypothetical-for-us baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).They are compatible. We do not have to choose between the one and the other.Choosing between one and the other was a mistake of the liberals.

The difference between the Archdiocese of Detroit and Michael Voris would then be that even though the both of them affirm all magisterial documents/teachings, Michael Voris would be saying that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to invisible and hypothetical cases accepted theoretically, in faith as a concept, while the Archdiocese and the Congregation for the Doctrine for the Faith, Vatican,would hold that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to visible, known and objective people saved outside the Catholic Church.

It would be easy for CMTV to see who is irrational, non traditional and heretical and they would be able to help others to also see the difference.

So CMTV could announce that they are affirming the traditional and perennial Magisterium of the Catholic Church along with , Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) interpreted rationally, that is without the false premise( invisible non Catholics are physically visible).

CMTV should not be expected to say by the present Magisterium that they can see people in Heaven and also physically see them on earth and that too, without faith and baptism in the Catholic Church.(AG 7,LG 14).

They should not be expected, by the Archbishop of Detroit, to affirm that people in Heaven allegedly saved outside the Church are also on earth.

They should not be expected to go into schism with the past popes and Church Councils on EENS.

CMTV should not have to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition instead of a continuity with the past exclusivist ecclesiology , an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of Tradition.-Lionel Andrades