We can affirm hypothetical and speculative Lumen Gentium 8, 14, and 16 along with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and this is not known to Paolo Pascualucci, the SSPX priests in Italy, Steve Skojec and Maike Hickson so Vatican Council II is presented as a rupture with Tradition

We can affirm hypothetical and speculative baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance along with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). This was not known to Paulo Pascualucci in his report on the blog 1Peter5.

We can affirm hypothetical and speculative  Lumen Gentium 8, 14, and 16  along with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Since this was not known to Paolo Pascualucci, the late Romano Amerio and  Monsgr. Brunero Gherardini.It is not known to the SSPX priests in Italy and neither to  Steve Skojec and Maike Hickson.So  Vatican Council II is presented as a rupture with Tradition on the blog 1Peter5. 1

They all had mistaken hypothetical and speculative cases,as being known and visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church.So emerged exceptions to the dogma EENS and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church. 

The  fault does not lie with Vatican Council II but their false premise.It created a non traditional conclusion, a rupture with Tradition.

For me Vatican Council II does not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.It is in harmony with  EENS.So there can only be an ecumenism of return and no rupture with the Syllabus of Errors.

-Lionel Andrades

APRIL 15, 2018

Six of Pasqualucci's 'distinct points of rupture with the Tradition of the Church in the texts of the Vatican II documents' are not a rupture

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/six-of-pasqualuccis-distinct-points-of.html

APRIL 15, 2018

The interpretation of Paolo Pasqualucci, Romano Amerio and Msgr. Brunero Gherardini is irrational it can be seen in the text of the blog 1Peter5 : They misinterpreted hypothetical cases in Lumen Gentium, Unitatitis Redintegratio and Nostra Aetate as being objective people saved outside the Church.This was a mistake

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/the-interpretation-of-paolo-pasqualucci.html

APRIL 14, 2018

This imporant point was overlooked by Paolo Pasqualucci, Romano Amerio and Msgr. Brunero Gherardinihttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/this-imporant-point-was-overlooked.html

APRIL 14, 2018

Once this is understood we can always interpret Vatican Council II as affirming an ecumenism of return only

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/once-this-is-understood-we-can-always.html

JUNE 18, 2014

Cristina Siccardi ,Paolo Pasqualucci use the irrational inference in the interpretation of Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/cristina-siccardi-paolo-pasqualucci-use.html