Sunday, May 27, 2018

Cardinal Burke has set a new theological and doctrinal model for sedevacantists and traditionalists.They can affirm tradition and Vatican Council II(Feeneyite). He indicates liberals can no more cite Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition, by using a false premise

From the blog TradCatKnight


May 18, 2018

Cardinal Burke: Catholics must let

 Christ reign as King in face of 

‘apostasy’ within Church


Lionel : Vatican Council II interpreted 
with a false premise, which I call Vatican
 Council II (Cushingite) results in a 
rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of
 Errors etc).
Vatican Council II without the false
 premise, which I call Vatican Council II
 ( Feeneyite) is in harmony with EENS,
 Syllabus of Errors, the past exclusivist
 ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, 
ecumenism of return etc.
Cardinal Burke has referred to false 
religions and has said that the true 
Church of Christ subsists in  only
 the Catholic Church(LG 8, Vatican 
Council II) so he infers that there is 
nothing in Vatican Council II to 
contradict what he stated on March
18,2018 at the Voice of the Family
Conference in Rome.
There is nothing in Vatican Council
 II to contradict what he said about
 other religions being false and the
 Catholic Church being the true
 Church of Christ?
Yes.But only if he is referring to 
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite). 
This is Vatican Council II interpreted
 without the false premise.
Trad Cat Knight like the other
 sedevacantists interpret Vatican 
Council II with the false premise, 
as do the liberals. So LG 8 etc would
 refer to known, non Catholics, 
saved outside the Church. So this 
would be a rupture with EENS
 and the rest of Tradition.
But what if LG 8 refers to unknown 
non Catholics in 2018 saved outside 
the Church, as I interpret it ? What if
 LG 8 refers only to a hypothetical 
case ? Then LG 8 would not be an
 exception to the dogma EENS
 and the past exclusivist 
understanding of salvation.Since an
 invisible person who does not exist
 in our reality could not be exception
 to the dogma EENS.
Since Cardinal Burke has not 
rejected Vatican Council II and has
 also said that other religions are
 false and the Catholic Church is the
 true Church of Christ, it indicates
 that he supports Vatican Council
 II ( Feneeyite), Vatican Council II 
without the invisible people are
 objectvely visible reasoning.
It means Cardinal Burke is affirming 
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, 
GS 22 etc but as being only
 hypothetical cases.In reality they
 cannot be anthing else for us humans.
He is also affirming the baptism
 of desire, the baptism of blood and 
being saved in invincible ignorance
 as only being hypothetical cases. 
They can only be speculatioin, 
theoretical possibilities and things
 hoped for, for us human beings. 
In individual cases they can only 
be known to God. So they are
 not exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
 They never ever were exceptions to
 EENS according to the 
missionaries and Magisterium of the 
16th cnetury.
So Cardinal Burke has not rejected 
Vatican Council II ( without the false
 premise) and he accepts  EENS
 ( interpreted without  the false 
premise). So he has an exclusivist
 understanding of the Catholic Church
 on the issue of salvation at least.
He supports  EENS , Vatican Council 
II, Catechism of the Catholic Church,
 Catechisms of Trent and Pius X, all
 without the false premise.So the 
ecclesiology of the Church before 
and after Vatican Council II is the 
He has now set a new theological
 and doctrinal model for the 
sedevacantists and traditionalists
 to follow.They can affirm 
tradition and Vatican Council II
He has also indicated that the
 liberals can no more cite 
Vatican Council II as a rupture
 with Tradition, by using a false
premise.-Lionel Andrades

Catholics must consciously place themselves under the “Kingship of Christ” in the face of enemies of the Church today attempting to “infiltrate the life of the Church herself and to corrupt the Bride of Christ by an apostasy from the Apostolic Faith,” Cardinal Raymond Burke indicated at a talk today in Rome.

The Cardinal, one of the dubia signers and a foremost defender of orthodoxy within the Church today, told participants at the annual Rome Life Forum that Christ as King reigns over his Bride the Church, over the world, and must also reign over human hearts.

These words of St. Paul “refer to the order and peace, the eternal salvation, for which God the Father sent His only-begotten Son to take our human nature and to suffer, die, rise from the dead and ascend to the right hand of Father,” he said.

“They refer to the Mystery of Faith, which assures us that Christ, seated at the Right Hand of the Father in glory, remains with us on earth, pouring forth, from His glorious pierced Heart, without measure and without cease, the sevenfold gift of the Holy Spirit upon His Mystical Body, the Church, that is, into human hearts,” he added.

The Cardinal said that “in Christ is realized the right order of all things, the union of heaven and earth, as God the Father intended from the beginning.”

“It is the obedience of God the Son Incarnate which reestablishes, restores, the original communion of man with God and, therefore, peace in the world. His obedience unites once again all things, ‘things in heaven and things on earth,’” he added.

Burke stressed that Christ’s Kingship over human hearts is not some “ideal to which only a few can attain but to which all are called.”

“It is, rather, a reality of divine grace which helps even the weakest and the most tried human subject to attain an heroic degree of virtue, if he or she only cooperates with divine grace,” he said.

A number of Catholic theologians loyal to the perennial teaching of the Church on marriage, the moral life, and reception of the sacraments have expressed concern over novel teachings from the highest levels within the Church that present the moral life as only an “ideal” to be aimed at, rather than a reality that is binding on all.

The Cardinal said that faithful Catholics must allow the Kingship of Christ to be exercised over their lives “most of all, through the conscience, ‘the voice of God’ expressing His law written upon every human heart.”

“The conscience, therefore, is not, as is often falsely understood and stated today, formed by the thoughts and desires of the individual but by the truth which ever purifies individual thoughts and desires, and directs them in conformity with the law of love of God and neighbor. Obedience to the Kingship of Christ is expressed by the resolve and effort to conform all of one’s thinking and speaking and acting to Christ alive for us in the living Apostolic Tradition,” he said.

Some dissident high-ranking prelates and theologians have portrayed conscience as a final and ultimate authority that must be followed even if it contradicts the laws of God and Church teaching.

Burke went on to stress how the Kingship of Christ applies not only to Christians, but to everyone on the world, including those who hold political office.

“The Kingship of Christ is, by nature, universal, that is, it extends to all men, to the whole world. It is not a kingship over only the faithful or over only the things of the Church, but over all men and all of their affairs,” he said.

“The kingship is exercised from the Heart of Christ in human hearts. It does not pretend to govern directly the world but to govern it through man,” he continued.

"Christians who do not pretend to govern the civil state by means of the Church at the same time are called to give an heroic public witness to the truth of the moral law, of the law of God. Thus, Christ’s Kingship is exercised by hearts one with His Royal Heart,” he added.

He encouraged Catholic families to enthrone an image of the Sacred Heart of Jesus in the home as a way of putting themselves under Christ’s reign.
“The Kingship of Christ in the home frees the members of the family and the family as a society to enjoy those rights and fulfill those duties, in accord with the will of God. The universality of the Kingship of Christ is reflected by the practice of enthroning the image of the Sacred Heart of Jesus in the home, and in the other places of our human endeavor.”
He also outlined how participation in the Eucharist is the “most perfect and efficacious means of the transformation of human hearts through union with the Heart of Christ, through submission to His Kingship of pure and selfless love.”

MAY 27, 2018

Things couldn't be better for Cardinal 

Raymond Burke

MAY 27, 2018

Liberals cannot criticize Cardinal Raymond

 Burke since he accepts Vatican Council II 

( Feeneyite),in harmony with EENS 

( Feeneyite),the Syllabus of Errors, an

 ecumenism and the Social Reign of Christ 

the King : traditionalists at conf. next 

month support the New Theology





Cushing Additions (2)

Cardinal Burke: False religions that

 permit abortion should be suppressed

Repost : Even members of the Lay Movements in the Catholic Church can proclaim the necessity of the Social Reign of Christ the King

TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018

Repost : The beauty of the Catholic Church is not there in any other religion says a Catholic priest.There cannot be Christ without the Catholic Church

MAY 22, 2018
Repost : Catholic political party needed in England

TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018

Repost : "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018" nor " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases " so Vatican Council II does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors (Graphics)

Cardinal Raymond Burke could meet the leaders of Forza Nuova and Militia Christi in Italy just as he met Matteo Salvini : Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation could be explained

MAY 23, 2018

Left and right schism

MAY 23, 2018

In a secular state which allows freedom of religion there could be pro-Catholic political parties, supporting the faith and moral teachings of the Catholic Church, and affirming in their manifesto the Social Reign of Christ the King

THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018

Cardinal Burke's reference to false religions not being paths to salvation is from Vatican Council II

THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018

Cardinal Raymond Burke contradicts Cardinal Luiz Ladaria's heretical statement : interprets Lumen Gentium 8 rationally and traditionally

 MAY 24, 2018

Cardinal Burke has affirmed the exclusive understanding of salvation and also Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) : it supports the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King

 THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018
Cardinal Raymond Burke has set an example for Catholics in general and traditionalists in particular since he has affirmed what I call Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and rejected Vatican Council II (Cushingite)


Feeneyism: It is the old theology and
 philosophical reaoning which says
 there are no known exceptions past or
 present, to the dogma EENS.There are
 no explicit cases to contradict the
 traditional interpretation of EENS.
Cushingism: It is the new theology and
 philosophical reasoning, which 
assumes there are known exceptions,
 past and present, to the dogma EENS,
 on the need for all to formally enter 
the Church.It assumes that the baptism
 of desire etc are not hypothetical
but objectively known.In principle
 hypothetical cases are objective
in the present times.
Baptism of Desire (Feeneyite): It
 refers to the hypothetical case 
of an unknown catechumen who 
desires the baptism of water but 
dies before he receives it and is saved.
 Since this is an invisible case in our 
reality it is not relevant to the dogma
Baptism of Desire (Cushingite): It
 refers to the known case of a
 catechumen who desires the baptism
 of water but dies before he receives
 it and is saved. Since this is a visible
 case or the SSPX it is relevant to the
 dogma EENS.
Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite): 
This refers to the hypothetical case
 of someone allegedly saved without
 the baptism of water in the Catholic 
Church, since he was in ignorance.
Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite):
 This refers to the explicit 
case of someone allegedly 
saved without the baptism of water
 in the Catholic Church, since
 he was in ignorance.Since it is an
 exception to the dogma EENS it
is assumed to be objectively known
 in particular cases.This reasoning
 is irrational.
Council of Florence: One of the
 three Councils which defined the
 dogma EENS.It did not mention
 any exceptions.It did not mention
 the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.
Liberal theologians: They 
reinterpreted the baptism of
 desire and being saved in 
invincible ignorance, as 
objective cases, known in
 the present times.They use 
Vatican Council II (Cushingite):
 It refers to the interpretation of 
Vatican Council II with Cushingism.
LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc
 refer not to hypothetical but 
known cases in the present 
times. So Vatican Council II emerges
 as a break with the dogma EENS.
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite): 
It refers to the interpretation of
 Vatican Council II withFeeneyism.
LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer 
to hypothetical cases, which
 are unknown personally in the 
present times.So Vatican Council
 II is not a break with EENS, the
 Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of 
return, the Nicene Creed 
( Feeneyite-one baptism),the 
teaching  on the Social Reign of 
Christ the King over all political 
legislation and the non separation
 of Church and State( since all 
need to convert into the Church
 to avoid Hell).
Letter of the Holy Office 1949
 to the Archbishop of Boston:
 It assumed hypothetical cases were
 defacto known in the present times.
 So it presented the baptism of 
desire etc as an explicit 
exception, to the traditional
 interpretation of the dogma
 EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard
 Feeney and the St.Benedict 
Center.Since they did not assume
 that the baptism of desire 
referred to a visible instead of 
invisible case.The Letter made the
 baptism of desire etc relevant 
to EENs.From the second part
 of this Letter has emerged 
the New Theology.It was Cushingite.
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 
( Feeneyite). It means accepting
 the Letter as Feeneyite based
 on the first part,only .It 
supports Fr. Leonard 
Feeney of Boston.The traditional
 interpretatiion of the dogma
 EENS does not mention any 
Letter of the Holy Office 
( Cushingite). It is based on 
the second part of the 
Letter.It rejects the traditional 
interpretation of EENS. Since 
it considers the baptism of 
desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and
 being saved in invincible ignorance
 ( Cushingite-explicit cases) as 
being exceptions to EENS 
( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes
 hypothetical cases are objectively
 visible and so they are exceptions
 to the first part of the Letter.

Baltimore Catechism: It assumed 
that the desire for the baptism
 of an unknown catechumen, 
who dies before receiving it and 
was saved, was a baptism like the
 baptism of water. So it was placed
 in the Baptism Section of the
 catechism. In other words it was 
wrongly assumed that the baptism
 of desire is visible and repeatable
 like the baptism of water or that
 we can administer it like the
 baptism of water.The Baltimore
 Catechism is accepted with the 
confusion.It can be
 interpreted with Cushingism or
Catechism of Pope X: It followed
 the Baltimore Catechism and placed 
the baptism of desire in the Baptism
 Section.It can be
 interpreted withCushingism or 
Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) ; It says
 'I believe in one baptism for the 
forgiveness of sins' and means 
there are more than three
 known baptisms. They are
 water, blood, desire, seeds 
of the Word etc.This is a
 Cushingite interpretation.
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It
 says 'I believe in one baptism 
for the forgiveness of sins and
 means there is one known
baptism the baptism of water.
It is Feeneyite.
New Theology: It refers to the
 new theology in the Catholic
 Church based on hypothetical 
cases being objective in the
 present times.So it 
eliminates the dogma EENS.
With the dogma EENS
 made obsolete the 
ecclesiology of the Church 
changes. There is a new
 ecclesiology which is a
 break with Tradition.
It's basis is Cushingism.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus 
( Cushingite): .It refers to 
the dogma but with exceptions.
All do not need to defacto 
convert into the Church in 
the present times, since 
there are exceptions.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus
 ( Feeneyite): It refers 
to the dogma as it was
 interpreted over the centuries.
There are no known exceptions
 to all needing to formally 
enter the Church, with faith
 and baptism, to avoid Hell.
Catechism of the 
Catholic Church ( Cushingite): 
CCC 1257 contradicts the 
Principle of Non Contraduction. 
Also CCC 848 is based on the new
 theology and so is a rupture 
with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).
Catechism of the 
Catholic Church ( Feeneyite):
 CCC 1257 does not contradict
 the Principle of Non Contradiction
 since there are no known exceptions
 to all needing the baptism of 
water for salvation. There are no
 known exceptions, since God is
 not limited to the Sacraments.
When CCC 846 states all who
 are saved are saved through
 Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 
does not contradict the dogmatic
 teaching on all needin to 
formally enter the Church.
CCC 846 does not contradict
 Ad Gentes 7 which states all 
need faith and baptism for salvatioon.


No comments: