Friday, May 11, 2018

Repost :Pope Benedict produces theology for the Left : new book Liberating Freedom: Faith and Politics in the Third Millennium / Joseph Ratzinger-Benedict XVI, “Liberare la libertà. Fede e politica nel terzo millennio” ( Cantagalli)

MAY 9, 2018

Pope Benedict produces theology for the Left : new book Liberating Freedom: Faith and Politics in the Third Millennium / Joseph Ratzinger-Benedict XVI, “Liberare la libertà. Fede e politica nel terzo millennio” ( Cantagalli)

Pope Benedict continues to write theology  for the Left. He proclaims the necessity of believing in God without the necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church.His new book to be released in Italy tomorrow would be useful for the Jewish Left, the Anti-Christ and a future one world religion.Pope Francis wrote the preface.
In his new book  Liberating Freedom: Faith and Politics in the Third Millennium he has not criticized the present human rights' priority being in Satan with abortion, homosexuality etc. Now he presents the Logos for all.This is a development. In the past it would be a vague Christology without the exclusivist ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church's traditional theology.So a false base was created for a new ecumenism. Would human rights being centered on God, without membership in the Catholic Church, be an outreach for unity with non Christians too?
In March 2016(Avvenire) he did not choose to affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.While at his lecture on faith and reason at Ratisbonne he did not cite Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II, which says all need faith and baptism  for salvation. Vatican Council II would be saying that  Muslims and other non Christians would need to convert into the Church for salvation.
Pope Benedict continues to support a new theology for the globalists.

As Cardinal Ratzinger he cited the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994).The LOHO is not a magisterial document since the Holy Spirit cannot make a mistake.Yet he referenced in the Catechism(1994) and the theological papers of the International Theological Commision. LOHO assumes unknown cases of the baptism of desire, invincible ignorance etc are known exceptions to EENS.It is a fact of life that we cannot see or meet BOD cases in real life.So they cannot be exceptions.

For LOHO invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.This is an objective mistake and cannot be inspired by the Holy Spirit.
Yet the liberal theologian Joseph Ratzinger based his new theology on LOHO . This was a mistake.

His friend Fr.Karl Rahner s.j placed LOHO in the Denzinger.For him too the dogma EENS was obsolete.The way was open for salvation outside the Church and the new  ecumenism. It rejected the Social Reign of Christ the King and the non separation of Church and State, since there was alleged salvation outside the Church for the liberals.This is a theme continued in the new book

The influence of Marcello Pera is there.The pope-emeritus' friend wrote Human Rights and Christianity.
'The book undoubtedly represents a great challenge for contemporary thought, and also, in particular, for the Church and theology. The discontinuity between the statements of the popes of the nineteenth century and the new vision that begins with “Pacem in Terris” is evident and on it there has been much discussion. It is also at the heart of the opposition of Lefèbvre and his followers against the Council. I do not feel able to give a clear answer to the issues of your book; I can only make a few notes which, in my view, could be important for further discussion.' 1
Lionel: He admits there is a break with the popes. He does not admit that this was  possible onlybecause he assumed invisible cases of the baptism of desire etc were visible exceptions to EENS.So EENS according to the Church Councils which defined it was rejected by him in heresy.It was schism with the past popes.The deception continues.

1. Only thanks to your book has it become clear to me to what extent a new course begins with “Pacem in Terris.” I was aware of how powerful the effect of that encyclical on Italian politics had been: it gave the decisive impulse for the opening up of Christian Democracy to the left. I was not aware, however, of what a new beginning this represented also in relation to the conceptual foundations of that party. And yet, as far as I remember, the issue of human rights actually acquired a place of great significance in the Magisterium and in postconciliar theology only with John Paul II.
Lionel: The Christian Democratic party in Italy has been closed down by the Left. But since the time of Pope Pius XII Italian politics excludes the teaching on the Catholic Church having the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation.
This was accomplised in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case with the Magisterium using a false premise. It was continued with Cardinal Ratzinger as Prefect of the CDF. He maintained the heresy and the false narrative for the liberals and the Masons.

The book refers to the Christian faith and not the Catholic Faith and so does Pope Francis. It praises the separation of Church and State.This is consistent with the  New Theology based on a new understanding of EENS, which makes the dogmatic teaching as it was known for centuries, obsolete, for the liberals and the Left.-Lionel Andrades

MAY 10, 2018

Matteo Salvini, leader of Eurosceptic party League and Silvio Berlusconi, leader of the Forza Italia party: “We will evaluate the government that is created, supporting any measures that are useful for Italians,” tweeted Mr Berlusconi. Photograph: Giulio Napolitano/Bloomberg

Pope Benedict's book which does not support the non separation of Church and State and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation has theology based upon a lie

No comments: