Dubbia Cardinal Walter Brandmuller and signatories of the Filial Correction have made a mistake like the present two popes

The fact remains that Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite) whatever is your view of Pope Pius XII or Fr.Leonard Feeney. So Cardinal Walter Brandmuller, the German cardinal who signed the Dubbia, made a big mistake.The same mistake was made by the signatories of the Filial Correction.

Vatican Council II (Cushingite) contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and makes it obsolete but Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) is in harmony with EENS ( Feeneyite) and the Syllabus of Errors .

Similarly the German cardinals and bishops are making the same mistake Cardinal Brandmuller and the signatories if the Filial Correction of Pope Francis.For all of them Vatican Council II (Cushingite) is a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite) and they do not know of any alternative option.

The position of Cardinal Raymond Burke another of the signatories of the Dubbia is unclear.Since at the recent Voice of the Family Conference in Rome in answer to a question he said that other religions are false.So for him it is assumed that other religions are false paths to salvation and the one true Church subsisit it in only the Catholic Church.

This means he could be interpreting EENS (Feeneyite) according to the Church Councils ( Florence 1441 etc) and the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.Cardinal Burke could say this based on LG 8 and AG 7 but what about LG 16 ( invincible ignorance etc) ? No.

If Cardinal Raymond Burke is affirming Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) then LG 16 refers to a hypothetical case only and not someone known to be saved outside the Church. This is the philosophy and theology of Feeneyism.

So Cardinal Burke is affirming Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and EENS ( Feeneyite) and the Catechisms too, with Feeneyism.So he can say that other religions are false religions.

He does not have to reject Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) to affirm the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church which indicates other  religions are not paths to salvation.He is affirming Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and also the Syllabus of Errors.

He is rejecting Vatican Council II (Cushinigite) like the sedevacantists but unlike them is also affirming Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).Neither is he rejecting EENS ( Feeneyite) like the liberals, Masons and the present two popes, but is rejecting EENS (Cushingite) which is the present official interpretation based on the irrational premise.

This is why Pope Benedict XVI in March 2016 said that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century. The present'magisterium' contradicts the past Magisterium on EENS.So at one time the magisterium is wrong.

The present two popes like Cardinal Brandmuller and the signatories of the Filial Correction, interpret Vatican Council II (Cushingite) as a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite) and they are not aware that Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is not a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite).

-Lionel Andrades