Catholics can start saying that Vatican Council II is in harmony with EENS as it was interpreted by the missionaries and Magisterium in the 16th century.

Catholics can start saying that the Church teaches Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston was correct and the Holy Office (CDF) in 1949 was wrong.

They can start saying that the Church still teaches the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma EENS since BOD, BOB and I.I refer to invisible people in 2018. There no examples of salvation outside the Church which are known to us or can be known to us.

They can start saying that Vatican Council II is in harmony with EENS as it was interpreted by the missionaries and Magisterium in the 16th century. 

So there is no change in the ecclesiology of the Church, before and after Vatican Council II, according to 'the Church'.

Of course by 'the Church' they are referring to the magisterial documents interpreted without the false premise. By ' the Church' they are not referring to the CDF and the two popes in this case. 1

-Lionel Andrades

Here is Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) with the Cushingite passages pruned.

1

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/catholics-can-start-saying-that-church.html