Placuit Deo promotes an ecumenical Jesus and not Jesus according to the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church,which did not separate Jesus from faith and baptism in the Church for salvation : Sandro Magister and Edward Pentin did not know

See the timing at 28:53 on this video. Cardinal Ladaria in answer to a question cites LG 8 as an exception to EENS.This is an objective error and it comes from the mistake the Church made in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.

At 17:11 he presents Christology without the traditional ecclesiocentrism ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

On the video of the Placuit Deo Press Conference(Time 17:11) Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) says Jesus is the only Saviour but he refuses to say that membership in the Catholic Church is necessary. So this is an ecumenical Jesus and not Jesus according to the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church,which did not separate Jesus from faith and baptism in the Church for salvation.

He cannot affirm this traditional teaching of the Church on salvation ( ecclesiology) since he assumes unknown and hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance,refer to known and visible in the flesh cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church.

This was the reasoning of the prelates in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case.Non existing people were projected as practical exceptions to traditional EENS.

Also the old Catechisms were re-interpreted.Since wherever  there were references to invisible BOD, BOB and I.I they were interpreted as being visible.

So when the popes were asked about BOD, BOB and I.I these were only questions about a hypothetical subject. But it was interpreted by the liberal theologians and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith as referring to known, visible, seen in flesh, objective known non Catholics who were saved without needing the baptism of water and Catholic faith.

It is with the deceptive theology that the Placuit Deo Press Conference was held.




SANDRO MAGISTER AND EDWARD PENTIN DID NOT KNOW 
Sandro Magister and Edward Pentin who were present at this Press Conference could have said that with the error of the CDF in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case, the interpretation of EENS and Vatican Council II changes. It changes immediately.They should have asked Cardinal Ladaria to comment on this.

They could have told him that when Lumen Gentium 8 (elements of sanctification and truth), which he refers to at the Press Conference,  is  assumed to be hypothetical and known only to God, then LG 8 is not a practical exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So they both(Magister, Pentin) could interpret LG 8 as referring to hypothetical cases only, not real people in 2018.Then for them LG 8 does not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, as Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Morani have suggested at this Press Conference.

Since for Cardinal Ladaria, LG 8 is an exception to the old teachings on the Church having the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation,he infers that there are known people saved outside the Church. For him there are visible in the flesh cases of non Catholics who are saved without being members of the Catholic Church-and he knows them personally.

With this philosophical irrationality the CDF has created a New Theology which says outside the Church there is known salvation.Cardinal Ladaria is supported in this error by the two popes and the political Left- and silent Catholic journalists who are still in ignorance.

Magister, Pentin and the AP correspondent, could have reminded Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Morani that the bottom line is that if BOD, BOB and I.I and also LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to physically visible or invisible  cases/people, Vatican Council II emerges as a rupture or continuity with Tradition.
They could have told Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, what he probably knows already by now, that if BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8 etc in Vatican Council II, refer to invisible or visible people, then there is a rupture or continuity with the  dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors( ecumenism of return), the Nicene Creed( I believe in only one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins it is the baptism of water).
They could have told him that if BOD, BOB and I.I and in Vatican Council II, LG 8 etc, refer to invisible people in real life and are only references to hypothetical cases then the Catechisms (Trent,Pius X,John Paul II) will  support Feeneyite EENS.
Also unebelievable for many, there emerges a Vatican Council II ( without the false premise), which is in harmony with the missionaries and Magisterium in the 16th century, in their interpretation of EENS.So Pope Benedict was wrong in March 2016 in the Avvenire interview in as much Cardinal Ladaria was wrong at the Placuit Deo Press Conference.
-Lionel Andrades

AUGUST 17, 2018

Obligated to the Masons and the Left Pope Benedict, Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Morani did not want to affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise. They did not truthfully interpret the Council without hypothetical cases being assumed to be objective people in the present times

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/obligated-to-masons-and-left-pope.html

AUGUST 17, 2018

Since the Church made an objective mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case, Placuit Deo could not affirm the traditional exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/since-church-made-objective-mistake-in.html

AUGUST 17, 2018

A factual error was made in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case and it has influenced the interpretation of Vatican Council II by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/a-factual-error-was-made-in-fr-leonard.html

DECEMBER 30, 2017

Repost : Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson says Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/12/repost-archbishop-thomas-egullickson.html

 AUGUST 16, 2018

It was based upon the error the CDF(Holy Office 1949) made in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case that at the Placuit Deo Press Conference on March 1,2018 Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj interpreted Lumen Gentium 8 as being an exception to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church. : a correction needs to be made by the CDF

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/it-was-based-upon-error-cdfholy-office.html

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/placuit-deo-promotes-ecumenical-jesus.html