Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston was orthodox and the popes and the present Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith are in heresy. Quite a thing to say ! I know.

The Church, comprised of the present two popes and the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, are opposed to 'the Church' of magisterial documents, interpreted without an irrational premise.This means that Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston is orthodox and the popes and the present Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith are in heresy.Quite a thing to say ! I know.

But it is simple. For example if you look at the baptism of desire literally, then there are no cases of the baptism of desire in 2018, or over the last 50 years.Every one agrees with me here.
For the Prefect of the CDF the baptism of desire refers to known people saved outside the Church.So there is a difference. He supports a New Theology in the Catholic Church based on this irrational observation.
His New Theology says that there are known people saved outside the Church with the baptism of desire and they are exceptions to the traditional teaching on all needing to be members of the Church for salvation.
The popes and cardinals wrongly infer that these known people( invisible for the average man) are visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. For the Prefect of the CDF they are examples of salvation outside the Church.

So Fr. Leonard Feeney says that there is no baptism of desire and the 'magisterium today' says there are known cases of the baptism of desire and they are relevant to EENS. The popes and cardinals say that the baptismk of desire etc are exceptions to all needing to enter the Church as members for salvation.

Where are the known cases of the baptism of desire in 2018 ? Whom can we meet or see saved as such and without the baptism of water?

None.

So this is an innovation in the Church. With an irrationality they have rejected the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Fr. Leonard held the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS and was in line with the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century. He also did not postulate that unknown people were known exceptions to his traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.

He said that there is no baptism of desire and he could have meant it literally instead of theologically like the Jesuits at Boston College.

So it is Fr. Leonard Feeney who is orthodox and the two popes and the cardinals and bishops who are in heresy.

Vatican Council II with the reasoning of Fr. Leonard Feeney, is in harmony with Tradition (past ecclesiology,Syllabus of Errors on an ecumenism of return, etc).There are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to the dogma EENS.

For Cardinal Luiz Ladaria  there are exceptions to EENS in Vatican Council II. He mentioned this in March 1, 2018 at the Placuet Deo Press Conference.

So 'the Church' of the ecclesiastics today is opposed to traditional doctrine and theology of 'the Church' of the 16th century for example. One Magisterium against another. And the present ecclesiastics at the Vatican are in heresy.It is intentional heresy.They oppose a Vatican Council  which can be interpreted in harmony with Tradition, in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, the Feeneyite version.

Even after being informed the present Church of ecclesiastics at the Vatican,  will not affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to the Magiseterium for example, in the 16th century.Nor will they comment on this issue. The traditionalists are also following the same error and remain mute.

They will not say that Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston is magisterial on EENS and that the CDF made an objective and factual mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.

I mentioned in a previous blog post that with a false theology the CDF Prefect interprets Vatican Council and so do the traditionalists and sedevacantists.This is the false church operating within the Catholic Church and the traditionalists are a part of it.They use the same  false New Theology to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS as does Cardinal Ladaria and popes Benedict and Francis.

With political correctness with Satan and the Left, they avoid the rational and alternative interpretation of magisterial documents(Vatican Council II, Catechisms etc).

Roberto dei Mattei and Christopher Ferrara have written books on Vatican Council II, interpreted according to the false church.For them it is obligatory to use the false premise, to create a rupture with Tradition.Yet they both will criticize the false church within the Catholic Church, when they are a part to it and contribute to it even after being informed.

It is easy for them to write books and give talks. They like this.But they will not affirm traditional mission based on EENS and Vatican Council II interpreted without the irrational reasoning.They allow the doctrinal confusion to remain within the Church.They remind me of the man whom Jesus asked to sell all his things and to follow Him and he could not do it, since he was a rich man.

Ferrara and Mattei remained silent  when Pope Benedict in March 2016 and Cardinal Ladaria in March 1,2018 chose to be the false church. Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria wanted to create a rupture with Tradition. Similarly Archbishop Guido Pozzo knows there is an alternative choice , a hermeneutic of continuity  with the past, but like Archbishop Augustine Di Noia at Ecclesia Dei,he will not want to endorse Feeneyite EENS and the past ecclesiology of the Church.May be their priority is their careers and not telling the truth to Catholics.

They will not announce that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949  used a false premise  and so did Pope Benedict (March 2016, Avvenire) and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria(March 1, 2018, Placuet Press Conference).

They want the whole Church to follow the error and be the false church.They will not affirm Feeneyite EENS and Feeneyite Vatican Council II.

-Lionel Andrades