Things are so bad on doctrine and theology in the Catholic Church that the new Chairman of the Unites States Catholic Conference of Bishops(USCCB) cannot deny what I have written.

Things are so bad on doctrine and theology in the Catholic Church that the new Chairman of the Unites States Catholic Conference of Bishops(USCCB) cannot deny what I have written.1

He will not affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.

He agrees with me?!

1.Practically there are no known people saved outside the Catholic Church with the baptism of desire(bod), baptism of blood(BOB) and in invincible ignorance(I.I). The Holy Office 1949 made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.

2.Common sense tells us that BOD, BOB and I.I are not physically visible cases and neither did the popes and saints over the centuries claim that they are.

3.In general people will agree that BOD,BOB and I.I refer to hypothetical cases only.

There is no denial also from Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee regarding the error he made in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.

In his  radio program this month he mentions  'elements of sanctification and truth'(Lumen Gentium 8)  as if it is an example of known salvation outside the Church and so an exception to the dogma EENS.This is irrational.It violates the Principle of Non Contradiction. How can we see people saved on earth ? How can they be in two places at the same time?
How can his new theology say outside the Church there is salvation.Where is this salvation?

1.Practically there are no known people saved outside the Church with 'elements of sanctification and truth'.So the Council Fathers at Vatican Council II picked up the error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.

2.The text of Lumen Gentium 8 does not state that there are physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church.So a wrong inference is made by Bishop Rhoades.

3.Common sense tells us it is a reference to a hypothetical case. It is speculation with good will.

So it was wrong for Bishop Kevin Rhoades to interpret Vatican Council II (LG 8 etc) as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.

There is no denial from the USCCB or Bishop Rhoades. No one wants to correct me.

So they know that I am correct and they do not want to say anything.-Lionel Andrades

1

SEPTEMBER 22, 2018

LUMEN GENTIUM 8 AND BOD,BOB AND I.I ARE HYPOTHETICAL AND THEORETICAL AND ARE NOT EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EENS. YET FOR BISHOP KEVEN RHOADES THEY ARE EXCEPTIONS.THIS IS A BIG MISTAKE OF THE USCCB DOCTRINAL COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN

HTTP://EUCHARISTANDMISSION.BLOGSPOT.COM/2018/09/SO-LUMEN-GENTIUM-8-AND-BODBOB-AND-II.HTML