Tuesday, October 16, 2018
The Oath Against Modernism: Template for Action Featured
Written by Hilary White
....Fortunately, we’ve got a name for the disease, and a holy pope who provided the cure. It is at last being widely acknowledged that the Asteroid we’ve all been watching is Modernism, the same “synthesis of all heresies” that Pius X tried to stop at the opening of the 20th century. A Rome conference sponsored in June this year by the formerly stalwart “conservative” LifeSiteNews focused on the triumphant resurgence of Modernism since Vatican II, identifying it as the source of the crisis; more or less the core of the Traditionalist position.
Lionel: Modernist Hilary White will now quote another Cushingite modernist Dianne Montagna.The blind modernist cites another who is also in the same ditch.
__________________________________
Reporting on the conference, Dianne Montagna wrote:
“Imagine that the trials of the current pontificate, the machinations of the German bishops, and Fr. James Martin’s controversial statements on homosexuality were to end tomorrow. Perhaps for a time some would feel that Mordor had been destroyed and sunshine and freedom were restored to the Shire, but the current crisis in the Church would not be over. Why? Because controversial passages in Amoris Laetitia, the German Bishops’ intercommunion proposal, and Fr. James Martin’s watering down of the Church’s teaching on homosexuality are only symptoms of a deeper problem. Health will not be restored to Christ’s Mystical Body until these deeper problems are identified, addressed and healed.”
Professor Roberto de Mattei and likeminded colleagues at that conference identified the source of the crisis as a resurgence of Modernism.
Lionel :They were aware of the New Theology but did not know precisely what makes the New Theology.
The new theology is based on allegedly visible for us baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).So with personally known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I the Catechism of Pope Pius X is interpreted as a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology which Pius X supported.
Prof. Roberto dei Mattei uses this irrational interpretation of BOD, BOB and I.I. So Vatican Council II is a rupture with EENS. EENS is a rupture with EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century...
_____________________
With some slight modifications, it is in essence the same theological disease that Pius X fought so ferociously. Most Traditionalists understand this, but since this pontificate – and especially in the last three months – many who have never called themselves that are coming to the same realisation.
Lionel : What is the 'theological disease'? The symptorms are not the cause. They must not be mixed up.
_________________________________
Diane Montanga again:
“According to the organizers of the June symposium, the rejection of the errors that have penetrated the Mystical Body of Christ, and the return, with God’s help, to complete Catholic truth believed and lived, are the necessary conditions for the Church’s renewal.”
This "Paranoid Extremist" Was Right and Has Now Been Vindicated Completely
St. Pius X, Pray For Us
As de Mattei explained, Modernism was defined by Pope St. Pius X to cover a set of “theological, philosophical, and exegetical errors” dating back into the 19th century...
Lionel: He did not mention what I call Cushingism. It is modernism used by him and Hilary White and the correspondents at Life Sites News.
__________________________
So, back to the question of what to do about it, as laymen with little power to change bishops or depose popes, perhaps we could usefully ask what the same saintly pope recommended as a remedy. Rather than dive into the complexities of theology, it might be more useful to examine another document from Pius X, a motu proprio issued in September 1910 called Sacrorum antistitum.
Lionel: Lay people must clarify that they can interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with what I call Feeneyism instead of the modenistic Cushingism.This is the beginning. They must understand this. Then things will fall into place.
____________________
This document is most famous for including the Oath Against Modernism, required of “all clergy, pastors, confessors, preachers, religious superiors and professors in philosophical-theological seminaries” of the Catholic Church until it was rescinded on 17 July 1967 by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, with the approval of Pope Paul VI.
Lionel:The Oath is meaningless now since the Nicene Creed can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism.Most Catholics use Cushingism which creates heresy and schism.
______________________________
At the suggestion of a priest I know who has spent his priestly life combating Modernism, we can perhaps examine the Oath not with a mind to taking it formally ourselves, but to create a programme of action. As a template for re-examining the truths of the Catholic Faith that the Neo-Modernists want to have disappear. I would suggest that a first step in any battle plan must be accurate intelligence. We have to know very precisely what our enemies are doing...
Lionel: Traditionalists are in the camp of the enemy. They are not aware of Cushingism.Liberals use Cushingism.Without Cushingism they cannot present Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition.
____________________________.
These are classic Modernist tropes, and they are refuted and warned against explicitly in the very opening passages of the Oath.
I . . . firmly embrace and accept each and every definition that has been set forth and declared by the unerring teaching authority of the Church, especially those principal truths which are directly opposed to the errors of this day...
Lionel: We do not have unity on EENS, Vatican Council II, Nicene Creed, Mission etc because of the modernism of Cushingism.
_________________________________
I promise that I shall keep all these articles faithfully, entirely, and sincerely, and guard them inviolate, in no way deviating from them in teaching or in any way in word or in writing. Thus I promise, this I swear, so help me God. . .
Lionel: Probably this was said by Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj when he became the Prefect of the CDF.On March 1,2018 with Cushingism he rejected the dogma EENS. He also interpreted Vatican Council II (LG 8) with Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism.
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was doing the same when he was the Prefect of the CDF.
This was a rupture with the Oath said in the 1930's and earlier.
-Lionel Andradeshttps://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/4140-the-oath-against-modernism-template-for-action
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment