They do not state that hypothetical and physically invisible cases mentioned in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc cannot be objective exceptions to the dogma EENS. Literally there are no such people known in 2018, for example. Over the last 50 years there were no practical cases to contradict Feeneyitie EENS, which they support.
So their position on Vatican Council II is still vague and unclear and they condone Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) in their diocese of Manchester, USA.It is the same with the St. Benedict Center, in the diocese of Worcester.They have received canonical recognition and they do not affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite)while they go along with the diocese only knowing about Vatican Council II ( Cushingite).
Most important, they do not affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS.
So they are overlooking a change in the meaning of the Nicene Creed and are allowing Vatican Council II(Cushingite) to contradict the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation) when this Catechism really affirms Feeneyite EENS.
Brother Andre Marie MICM, Prior, at the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, Hampshire and the religious community Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, would agree that there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) or being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I). We cannot meet or see someone saved outside the Church since this is only possible for God.
So for us humans BOD, BOB and I.I are irrelevant to the dogma EENS. Similarly LG8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not objective cases and so are not exceptions to the past ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
Both St. Benedict Centers in Manchester and Worcester, do not ask their bishops to affirm Vatican Council II rationally.
I have been writing to them about this over the last few years.As traditionalists they do not ask the SSPX , FSSP and the sedevacantists MHFM, to also endorse Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) instead of the present Vatican Council II ( Cushingite).
They need to support Vatican Council II with what I call Feeneyism (invisible people are simply invisible in 2018) and not with Cushingism ( invisible people are physically visible in 2018, they are objective exceptions to EENS, BOD, BOB and I.I contradict EENS). This needs to be part of their Catholic education progam at SAI and their doctrinal position in general.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.scribd.com/document/243253257/Syllabus-SAI-pdf#download
http://catholicism.org/become-a-reservoir-then-and-aqueduct.html
http://www.saintaugustineinstitute.org/your-teachers
http://www.saintaugustineinstitute.org/your-teachers
SEPTEMBER 10, 2017
Catholic Identity Conference in October limited by a false theology and new salvation doctrines
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/09/catholic-identity-conference-in-october.html
OCTOBER 21, 2018
Canonist Peter Vere's Cushingite understanding of extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II is now obsolete : so is his Letter to the St.Benedict Center
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/canonist-peter-vers-cushingite.html
No comments:
Post a Comment