On November 9 I e-mailed this blog post to Bishop Robert Morlino. He then died.1
Bishop Morlino and Fr. John Zuhlsdorf interpret Vatican Council II like Archbishop Guido Pozzo.
Archbishop Pozzo would be willing to officiate at the funeral Mass for Bishop Morlino.
Bishop Morlino and Fr. John Zuhlsdorf interpret Vatican Council II like Archbishop Guido Pozzo.
Archbishop Pozzo would be willing to officiate at the funeral Mass for Bishop Morlino.
He re-interprets the Nicene, Apostles and Athanasius Creed and offers the Latin Mass.
He re-interprets extra ecclesiam nulla salus as a rupture with the Magisterium of the 16th century and offers the Latin Mass.
He re-interprets Vatican Council II and the Catechisms as a rupture with EENS and is allowed to offer the Latin Mass or Mass in English.
All this would be heresy in the 16th century and he would not have been allowed to offer Holy Mass since he would be in sacrilege.The Mass would be sacrilegeous for him.
Today he has no problem since he has the support of the political Left.
He knowingly flouts the liturgical theology and teachings of the Church and we have to go go up to him to receive the Sacraments.
He will not issue a denial and claim I am wrong since his priority is to please the world and not God.Truth is not a priority.
He will not say, "Lionel is wrong. I affirm the strict interpretation of EENS". He knows he does not affirm EENS and wants to carry on in this way.
He will not say, "The baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to invisible people, speculative and theoretical cases." He and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) are not interested.
He would interpret all Magisterial documents with visible-for-him BOD, BOB and I.I to create a rupture with Tradition.
He would interpret all Magisterial documents with visible-for-him BOD, BOB and I.I to create a rupture with Tradition.
He will not announce that he is going to interpret Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical.This is anathema for the political Left and ecclesiastical Masonry.
He will probably be part of the Vatican-SSPX Doctrinal talks and will make sure his heretical views will be considered the Deposit of the Faith.
He knows that there is a mistake in Vatican Council II which was not known to Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop Bernard Fellay but will not announce it.
The same mistake was made by the CDF ( Holy Office 1949) in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.The CDF wanted Fr.Leonard Feeney to accept that invisible cases of BOD,BOB and I.I were visible exceptions to EENS. Fr.Feeney had to accept the CDF (Holy Office) Letter in 1949.It says not every one needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation.So it contradicted the dogma EENS defined by three Church Councils-and that too with an irrationality,assuming invisible people are visible.
Fr.Leonard Feeney who offered the Tridentine Rite Mass, is slandered on Wikipedia,EWTN, Catholic Answers etc and Archbishop Guido Pozzo. Ecclesia Dei and the CDF do not defend him.
With all this irrationality and heresy the Archbishop would be willing to officiate at funerals and weddings.
According to Canon Law Archbishop Pozzo like the present two popes should not be allowed to offer Holy Mass .Their mortal sin of faith is an impediment- Lionel Andrades
1.
______________________________________
According to Canon Law Archbishop Pozzo like the present two popes should not be allowed to offer Holy Mass .Their mortal sin of faith is an impediment- Lionel Andrades
1.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment