For me Vatican Council II (LG 8 etc) is not a rupture with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). So the Council is Feeneyite.Not for him.
For Bro. Andre Marie, Prior at the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, N.H, USA, the Council is not Feeneyite since Lumen Gentium 8(LG 8) in Vatican Council indicates that 'elements of sanctification and truth' in other religions are not just hypothetical cases.
They are concrete, actual, real people, non Catholics saved outside the Church. They are saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, LG 14).This is why LG 8, is a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return etc) for him, Cardinal Walter Kasper and Cardinal Péter Erdő and traditionalists in general.
For me physically invisible non Catholics, cannot be relevant or an exception to the traditional strict interpretation of EENS. So I affirm Vatican Council II, without the irrational premise( invisible non Catholics are visible) and non traditional inference( they are visible examples of salvation outside the Church).They are concrete, actual, real people, non Catholics saved outside the Church. They are saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, LG 14).This is why LG 8, is a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return etc) for him, Cardinal Walter Kasper and Cardinal Péter Erdő and traditionalists in general.
Bro. Andre Marie uses the false premise and inference and then interprets Vatican Council II like Kasper and Erdo and his liberal bishop in the diocese of Manchester, Peter Anthony Libasci.
So for this 'accomodation'; this rejection of Feeneyite EENS, he is recognized as a Prior by Bishop Libasci .Similarly the other St. Benedict Center, in the diocese of Worcester, whose religious also promote the same error, have been granted full canonical status.Both groups interpret Vatican Council II irrationally like their bishops.
Bro. Andre Marie rejects Vatican Council II which I affirm and interprets Vatican Council II like the liberals, while I do not do so, avoiding the false premise and inference.
How can LG 8 be an exception to Feeneyite EENS? This is not only testing our intelligence , it is a scandal.Where are the practical examples ?
SACRILEGE
He does not affirm Vatican Council II rationally and then goes up to receive the Eucharist at Holy Mass.He interprets hypothetical cases mentioned in the Catechisms as a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX( ecumenism of return etc) and then goes up to receive the Sacraments.
He interprets, 'I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church...'(Nicene Creed) , as the Holy Spirit teaching the Church that personally unknown and hypothetical cases mentioned in magisterial documents , are objective and practical exceptions to the traditional exclusive ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.This is a scandal.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective error ?
A prior who does not interpret the Nicene Creed, Vatican Council II and the Catechisms rationally and traditionally, needs to rectify the scandal, before he receives the Sacraments.
It's a hard choice for Bro. Andre, I know. Since the Prefect of the CDF and the present two popes are enforcing scandal and sacrilege in the Church.
In an e-mail message to Warren Goddard, who affirms the strict interpretation of EENS,Bro.Andre practically changed his position on BOD, BOB and I.I and cited the latinist Ryan Grant to support his new view.
Ryan Grant in an article for Faithfaul Answers, interpreted invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I as visible exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS.So for him too LG 8 would be a rupture with Tradition-as it would be for his bishop.
FEENEYITES ARE REJECTING FEENEYISM
Feeneyites are rejecting Feeneyism and switching to the politically correct with the Left, liberal position on BOD,BOB and I.I .
Similarly a religious sister with the SBC where Bro. Thomas Augustine MICM is the prior, in the diocese of Bishop Robert McManus, in Worcester, was not willing to proclaim the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS when asked on their vocation video on Youtube.
Similarly a religious sister with the SBC where Bro. Thomas Augustine MICM is the prior, in the diocese of Bishop Robert McManus, in Worcester, was not willing to proclaim the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS when asked on their vocation video on Youtube.
Candidates with a vocation to the religious life for bishops McManus and Libasci would only be acceptable when they say unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are known and practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.This would not be anti-Semitic for the leftist SPLC, ADL etc.
The MICM sisters and the prior at Worcester are also re interpreting irrationally and heretically, the Nicene Creed, Athanasius Creed, Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
So it is no surprise when Cardinal Kasper says that when ecclesiology can be changed why cannot the Eucharist be given to the divorced and remarried.-Lionel Andrades
1.
Baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance (I.I)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment