Phil Lawler contradicts William and Amy Fahey on the faculty of Thomas More College of Liberal Arts :Nicene Creed changed

Phil Lawler and Anthony Esolen are on the faculty at the Thomas More College (TMC) of Liberal Arts and I have been sending them,and the rest of the faculty, posts from this blog, which say that they support public heresy and sacrilege.

Phil Lawler it has been reported many times on the Internet, elsewhere, supports the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). So the baptism of desire (BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) would not be exceptions to the dogma EENS for him.They are not visible non Catholics saved outside the Church in 2018.

I do not know Anthony Esolen's position on this issue, I am waiting for his clarification.

However William Edmund Fahey, the President of TMC would need the approval of Cardinal Sean O'Malley, the Archbishop of Boston and the bishops of New England to continue to be a tutor and President at TMC.So he would have to teach the students at TMC that BOD, BOB and I.I are examples of non Catholics saved outside the Church.So he would reject the strict interpretation of EENS which Phil Lawler supports.

So this is a faculty divided on doctrine and faith like the rest of the Catholic Church in New England.

Amy Fahey, a tutor at TMC and wife of the President, William Fahey has not responded.
 

William and Amy Fahey would be interpreting the Catechism of Pope Pius X as a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX( ecumenism of return ect). Since invincible ignorance, for example, mentioned in the Catechism of Pope Pius X, would refer to visible and known people saved outside the Church.

Meanwhile Phil Lawler would support the Syllabus of Errors on an ecumeism of return and no salvation outside the Catholic Church.Since BOD, BOB and I.I do not refer to known people saved outside the Church for him.They are not exceptions to EENS and the past ecclesiology of the Church.

The Nicene Creed will have been changed for the Faheys, as it is for Cardinal Sean O'Malley and the bishops of Worcester and Manchester, USA, but  it would still be the same for Lawler.

William and Amy Fahey have not denied what I keep repeating on this blog.Since if there was a denial it would mean they support the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and BOD, BOB and I.I are not exceptions.This would not be politically correct with the Left.

It would also be saying that Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct in the Boston Case and the Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake, violating the Principle of Non Contradiction.

It would mean the St. Benedict Center of Fr. Leonard Feeney, persecuted by Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits, was orthodox  and Pope Pius XII was in heresy on EENS, with his silence.He did not support Fr. Leonard Feeney in public.

Heresy and sacrilege is being maintained by Cardinal Sean O'Malley and William and Amy Fahey have to  support it. It is irrational, non traditional and heretical but it is also the teaching of the present two popes.

-Lionel Andrades