Pope Benedict issued Summorim Pontificum as bait for the Society of the St. Pius X(SSPX). He wanted them to accept Vatican Council II by wrongly assuming there was known salvation outside the Church.
He has been plugging this bad philosophy and theology for political reasons, since he was a young man.
He could have told the SSPX to come into the Church, accepting Vatican Council II without implying that there were people saved outside the Church who were nameable, see able and very real in the present times, since 1965.If he did so it would be the end of a life time's work in error and the Masons would come for him.
They could have put pressure on him in March 2016( Avvenire), when he came out of the blues, saying that EENS today was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century. He was trying to dupe us by saying that Vatican Council II (with known salvation outside the Church) created 'the development'( rupture with traditional EENS).
He was updating and consolidating his bad work in March 2016 by also saying there could no more be mission after Vatican Council II.Since if there was known salvation outside the Church why have Mission?
He was also still telling us that every one had to interpret Vatican Council II as saying there is salvation outside the Church, even if this is the precise cause, of what he calls, 'the hermeneutic of rupture' with the past.
He was also still telling us that every one had to interpret Vatican Council II as saying there is salvation outside the Church, even if this is the precise cause, of what he calls, 'the hermeneutic of rupture' with the past.
In other words hypothetical cases and speculative possibilities are examples of known salvation in the present times(2018).They are objectively seen Catholics saved outside the Church.
The irony is that even though the SSPX bishops and priests, generally, believe there is salvation outside the Church and they wrongly interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS, they did not fall for the ruse
However the traditionalists at the St. Benedict Center(SBC), and FSSP, caved in, in exchange for official recognition.
However the traditionalists at the St. Benedict Center(SBC), and FSSP, caved in, in exchange for official recognition.
The SBC condones the interpretation of Vatican Council II with known salvation outside the Church by their bishops in Worcester and Manchester, USA.
All the bishops in New England say there is salvation outside the Church even if they there are no such cases in real life and they know of no practical exceptions to EENS.
All the bishops in New England say there is salvation outside the Church even if they there are no such cases in real life and they know of no practical exceptions to EENS.
The SBC will still not interpret Vatican Council II knowing there is no salvation outside the Church.LG 8, LG 16 etc are examples of known non Catholics saved outside the Church, for these communities of Fr. Leonard Feeney.So in a vague way they reject and accept Vatican Council II.
The on line articles by Bro.Andre Marie MICM do not state that Vatican Council II is in harmony with EENS. Nor do they call the Council Feeneyite,since his theology is Cushingite.
All this has been a big help for Popes Benedict and Francis and the Prefect of the CDF, Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, since there is no one to tell them that Vatican Council II says there is no salvation outside the Church.
Fr. John Zuhlsdorf praises Summorum Pontificum and says BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS.So he maintains that there is salvation outside the Church and offers the Latin Mass.His theology is a rupture with the 16th century.
So the Latin Mass today is not the Tridentine Latin Mass of the 16th century.
So the Latin Mass today is not the Tridentine Latin Mass of the 16th century.
So Summorum Pontificum has given as the Latin Mass, which is a Novus Ordo Mass.It is not the 'Mass of the Ages'.The Mass of the Ages was Feeneyite.There was no salvation outside the Church for the Magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century.
So Catholics falsely project the Latin Mass today as being traditional. The Thomas More College of Liberal Arts in New Hampshire, USA has a traditio and Restoration section.At the same time they are associated with the liberal left at St.Benet's Hall,Oxford which supports the Latin Mass offered with Vatican Council II interpreted as a rupture with Tradition.
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf projects the vestments and rubrics of the Latin Mass but will not support the strict interpretation of EENS.He interprets Vatican Council II like the liberal Bologna School, with BOD, BOB and I.I being exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
Rorate Caeli, Angelus Press, Michael Matt, Chris Ferrara and others project the Latin Mass as if today it is the same Mass as in the 16th century. So in BOD, BOB and I.I there are practical exceptions to EENS for them, as it was for Archbishop Lefebvre when he offered the Mass in Latin and as it is for Pope Benedict when he offers Mass in Italian.- Lionel Andrades
December 13, 2018
Faculty divided
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/faculty-divided.html
December 12, 2018
Phil Lawler contradicts William and Amy Fahey on the faculty of Thomas More College of Liberal Arts :Nicene Creed changed https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/phil-lawler-contradicts-william-and-amy.html
DECEMBER 7, 2018
Alleged faithful college coming to New England,USA is Cushingite and not Feeneyite : interprets Vatican Council II and Catechism with an irrational premise to create a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/alleged-faithful-college-coming-to-new.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment