Wednesday, January 16, 2019

Longenecker, Kwasniewski,Skojec agree that they are in heresy and sacrilege : no denial from them

January 9, 2019

Longenecker, Kwasniewski,Skojec agree that they are in heresy and sacrilege : no denial from them

What would be astonishing for many is that Fr.Dwight Longenecker, Prof. Peter Kwasniewski, Steve Skojec and the others,agree that they are in heresy and they attend Holy Mass in sacrilege.They have to live with this.Since they do not want to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Traditional EENS would be the only option left if they issued a denial.
They cannot deny what I have written since they would be forced to say that Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation and this would be all in 2019.All includes, those who know and do not know Jesus and the Church and the importance of the Church for salvation.It includes those who have had the Gospel preached to them and those who have not.
Vatican Council II refers to all in Ad Gentes 7.
So it is the Catholic Church which teaches that all need faith and baptism for salvation, while they personally cannot know any one in 2019  saved outside the Church.
It means Pope Pius XII and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made a mistake in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case. Also Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria sj, made the same mistake in two papers of the International Theological Commission.They all assumed that there was known salvation outside the Catholic Church and so all did not need to be Catholic,all did not need faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7).
The same mistake was repeated by the Council Fathers at Vatican Council II.They wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire(BOD) , baptism of blood(BOB)  and invincible ignorance (I.I) were exceptions to EENS.So they also projected other hypothetical cases(LG 8 etc) as being relevant to the orthodox passages in Vatican Council II which support exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
 This is a mistake I avoid.
For me the Conciliar Church is saying all non Catholics need to convert into the Church with faith and baptism.They  need to become  members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.This means there is only an ecumenism of return.There is only the past exclusivist concept of salvation.The Church is still Feeneyite.Since like Fr.Leonard Feeney it says that literally there are no known cases of non Catholics with the BOD, BOB and I.I.Practically there cannot be exceptions to EENS for us human beings.
 This is the Catholic Church for me since BOD, BOB and I.I, like LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3,NA 2,GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases.But they are not hypothetical for Longenecker, Kwasniewski and Skojec, nor for Bishop Fellay, the Angelus Press and the editor of Remnant News Michael  Matt and the publisher of The Wanderer, Joseph Matt.There are exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS for them. They are exceptions since they allegedly know people saved outside the Church.These are not just invisible cases.Invisible people of course, cannot be exceptions to EENS.
With this reasoning they have changed the understanding of the Creeds, the Catechisms contradict themselves, St. Thomas Aquinas is at odds with the old catechisms and the past popes and  Vatican Council II is a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX( EENS, ecumenism of return).Traditional Mission and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King is made obsolete.With all this heresy their Masss is a sacrilege.They need to remove the scandal in public, and confess, in the Sacrament of Reconciliation, mortal sins of faith.They need to correct the error.
They know that they are in heresy and sin and so also are the popes, cardinals and bishops. They will all continue with the error.Since if they proclaimed the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, they would be persecuted.
The ecclesiastics at the Vatican to protect themselves would not allow Fr. Longenecker to offer Holy Mass and the secular forces may target him with leftist laws, to bring him in line with Satan.
So like the converts Fr.Brian Harrison and Edward Pentin, they accept that they are in heresy attend Mass in sacrilege and maintain the prudent status quo interpreting all hypothetical cases, in magisterial documents, especially Vatican Council II with the irrational New Theology and New Philosophy.
So do not expect any denial from them.Neither from Chris Ferrara,Roberto dei Mattei, the latinist Ryan Grant, and professors John Lamont, Thomas Pink, John Rao and Joseph Shaw.They accept they are in heresy. They agree with me.
They will sign petitions for the pope to accept Catholic doctrine on morals and the Eucharist but they will not say that there are no physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I  and LG 8, LG 16, GS 22 etc in 2019.They will not conclude that there are no literal  cases of BOD, BOB, LG 8, LG 16 etc in 2019 there are no practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.This is EENS as it was known to St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Robert Bellarmine and St. Augustine and the missionaries in the 16th century. 
None of them will write:    
 
STATEMENT OF CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS BELIEFS                     
 'Lionel, we would like to inform you that for me/us BOD, BOB and I.I  and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only.
So they are not practical exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
We accept EENS with BOD, BOB and I.I not being exceptions.
We accept Vatican Council II with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc not being objective exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.
We affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS, the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church and an ecumenism of return.'-Lionel Andrades 




https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/longenecker-kwasniewskiskojec-agree.html

No comments: