On the plane from Abu Dhabi when the pope said that he was following Vatican Council II it was false.There is nothing in Nostra Aetate to contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).The pope did not want to use Feeneyite theology to interpret Vatican Council II.No one was also pushing him to do so.Now a new super dicastery is to be formed which will interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingite theology, instead of the traditional Feeneyite one, and there is no opposition.The cardinals and bishops do not even acknowledge the error .The bloggers and websites are afraid to mention it out of fear of losing their reputation and their media.
After the New Zealand incident David Domet on Vox Cantoris prohibited a discussion of Vatican Council II and EENS interpreted with Feeneyite theology instead of his usual Cushingite one.He also rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
He clearly interpreted Catholic salvation theology with Cushingism.For me there was no difference between Domet and Bishop Robert Barron.Both were correct with the Left in Canada.This is not the fruit of the Traditional Latin Mass but Domet's personal attachment to his blog.It would be the same with the owner of the blog Rorate Caeili and other traditionalist blogs.They do not affirm Vatican Council II and EENS, Feeneyite, to protect their interests.Just as David Domet caved it was the same with Michael Voris.
Michael Voris at Church Militant TV posted an article by Jim Russell,Strange Doctrines of Fr. Feeney.Russel used Cushingite theology to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS.This is the theology which supports the condemnation of the St. Benedict Center(SBC) by the Diocese of Manchester and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF). The SBC, Feeneyites, interpret both Vatican Council II and EENS, with Feeneyite theology.So Michael Voris' visit to the St. Benedict Center and his interview of Brother Andre Marie MICM, was negated with Russell's article.
With that article by Jim Russell, Voris was saying that he is not a Feeneyite and that BOD, BOB and I.I 1 were exceptions to EENS and so was LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc.2 No one corrected Russell's article.
When he was in the Diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire .Michael Voris was saying outside the Church there is no salvation.He supported Brother Andre Marie for whom BOD, BOB and I.I are not personally known cases and so are not literal exceptions to EENS. Also for Brother Andre Marie invisible cases of LG 16(invincible ignorance) and LG 14( case of the unknown catechumen) etc cannot be personally visible exceptions to EENS. So in the Catechism of the Catholic Church CCC 847 and 848 (invincible ignorance) would also not contradict Feeneyite EENS for Brother Andre Marie.
But when CMTV posted Jim Russell's article they were saying like Russell and the CDF, that BOD, BOB and I.I were exceptions to EENS. They referred to literal cases.They were saying that LG 16, LG 14 etc were exceptions to EENS. They agreed with the Secretaries of the CDF for whom CCC 847 and 848 were exceptions to CCC 846 ( outside the Church no salvation) and EENS.
CMTV in u-turn supported the Left and the CDF with Cushingism and condemned 'the Strange Doctrines' of Fr. Leonard Feeney.Michael Voris supported the use of the irrational premise and inference of the Cushingites Michael Sean Winters and Jim Russell.
So even if he Michael Voris and the CMTV Staff understood what I keep writing , for political reasons, it was expedient, not to affirm Vatican Council II and EENS with Feeneyism( hypothetical cases are just hypothetical and so are not objective and literal exceptions to EENS).They have to keep their business together and stay above water.
The comments on Michael Voris' videos on the St. Benedict Center, were based on Cushingite Vatican Council II.No moderator was there to correct them with Feeneyism.
Similarly Cushingite Fr. John Zuhlsdorf will comment on God allowing a pluralism of religions but will have to say that the BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.God seemingly also allows invisible people to be visible exceptions to EENS.
When they say there are exceptions to EENS in Vatican Council II it is Cushingism.It means Fr. Zuhlsdorf interprets LG 16( invincible ignorance),LG 14( case of the unknown catechumen) as being literal cases in 2019.They are known people known to him saved outside the Catholic Church. This is Cushingism.
When Fr.Zuhlsdorf was accused by Michael Sean Winters of supporting Fr. Leonard Feeney on EENS he denied it.Since Fr.Z wants to be politically correct with the Left on Vatican Council II and EENS. Cushingism is playing safe.It is being prudent for him.It was the late with the late Mons. Ignacio Barreiro.
The Left knows that the past exclusivist ecclesiology, the ecumenism of return and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King is all hinged on EENS.So they watch to see if any one important supports it.David Domet possibly got a warning and he went down without a whimper on his blog. Michael Voris tried to appeased the threats probably by posting Russell's article.Remember Voris was once told not to use the word Catholic.The same hate is now directed at the traditionalist St. Benedict Center.None of the Cushingite traditionalists are supporting them with a Feeneyite interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS.
Now a Cushingite dicastery will be formed which will interpret Vatican Council II just like Fr. John Zuhlsdorf.So there will be no basis for traditional mission, which required non Catholics to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.Objective reality will presented a new by the Directors of the Offices of Pastoral Mission which will coordinate with the new dicastery..
ADVANCE NOTICE
I am not attached to my blog Eucharist and Mission (Lionel's blog).I will let it go when I have to.So if there are any blog posts which are important or useful for any one , make your copy now and save it.
I have been an unabashed and flagrant Feeneyite - and enjoyed it.-Lionel Andrades
1
BOD(baptism of desire), BOB(baptism of blood) and I.I(invincible ignorance).
2.
Lumen Gentium 8 ,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Gaudium et Specs 22 etc
https://fundingmorality.com/project/view/saint-benedict.html
APRIL 20, 2019
Brother Andre Marie MICM has referred to the Sacred Magisterium. However Vatican Council II, Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus are all written with Cushingite philosophy and theology, which creates error. This error is not magisterial https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/04/brother-andre-marie-micm-has-referred.htmlhttps://fundingmorality.com/project/view/saint-benedict.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment