The approach which should have been used by the 19 signatories of the Open Letter to the Bishops on Pope Francis' heresies would be to identify Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite). Then interpret the Council in harmony with all Magisterial documents, also interpreted with Feeneyism.
They would not say that he 'seems' to be promoting heresy.
This has not been done in the present Open Letter and even Cushingite Massimo Faggioli noted it. The signatories have pointed out the heretical doctrines but not the particular theology (Cushingism) which is responsible for it and which can be avoided in future.
Pope Francis cites Vatican Council II (Cushingite) in his defence. He does not disagree with those who criticize him. On the plane from Abu Dhabi, when asked, he said that he had not shifted a millimetre or two from Vatican Council II. He meant Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) in which Lumen Gentium 16, for example, refers to known non Catholics saved outside the Church in ignorance or a good conscience.
But there is no such person in 2019 he had to be told. LG 16 refers to only a hypothetical case. So it does not contradict Feeneyite EENS which suggests that the person with whom he signed the document in Abu Dhabi was on the way to Hell. Vatican Council II (AG 7) says he does not have faith and baptism for salvation. This is interpreting Vatican Council II without the false premise. It is Feeneyism.
His critics do not point out the difference between Vatican Council II Cushingite and Feeneyite.The conclusions of the two interpertations are different. One is traditional and rational and the other is heretical and non traditional.It is black and white and like the binary system of the computers.
Pope Francis cites Vatican Council II (Cushingite) in his defence. He does not disagree with those who criticize him. On the plane from Abu Dhabi, when asked, he said that he had not shifted a millimetre or two from Vatican Council II. He meant Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) in which Lumen Gentium 16, for example, refers to known non Catholics saved outside the Church in ignorance or a good conscience.
But there is no such person in 2019 he had to be told. LG 16 refers to only a hypothetical case. So it does not contradict Feeneyite EENS which suggests that the person with whom he signed the document in Abu Dhabi was on the way to Hell. Vatican Council II (AG 7) says he does not have faith and baptism for salvation. This is interpreting Vatican Council II without the false premise. It is Feeneyism.
His critics do not point out the difference between Vatican Council II Cushingite and Feeneyite.The conclusions of the two interpertations are different. One is traditional and rational and the other is heretical and non traditional.It is black and white and like the binary system of the computers.
Once it is clear that Pope Francis is using Cushingite theology, which is different from my Feeneyite theology, his doctrinal errors can be identified.
Then when Pope Francis is asked about it he cannot cite Vatican Council II ( Cushingism).There would be no citation in the Council, which would support him.If he uses the irrational premise he would be checked.
If he says that Nostra Aetate contradicts Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation, he would be corrected.No where does Nostra Aetate say that there are physically known non Catholics saved outside the Church. It does not say that we know any one who is an exception to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
If he says Protestants do not need to enter the
Church
since they are saved in imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3) it
would be pointed out that UR 3 refers to a hypothetical case.It does not
refer to someone we know in 2019. So it is not an exception to Ad Gentes 7 which says all need Catholic faith and the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.So he cannot cite Vatican Council II any more.
If he says the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)
is obsolete with Vatican Council II it would be pointed out to him that
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc can refer to only
hypothetical people and so are not literal cases of non Catholics saved
outside the Church.They are not objective exceptions to EENS in 1965-2019.The Council, Feeneyite, supports 'triumphalism' and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
So he has no argument any more from Vatican Council II to support his heresies.
Presently Pope Francis and Pope Benedict reject EENS with the irrational Cushingite premise and inference.
This is heresy.
He changes the meaning of the Athanasius Creed with allegedly visible cases of LG 8, LG 16 etc.This is irrational. It is also heresy.
He
changes our understanding of the Nicene Creed and Apostles Creed with
alleged seen in the flesh cases of non Catholics saved outside the
Catholic Church, when Vatican Council II does not mention any.This is first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul. Doctrine is being changed here.The Creeds have a new meaning. This is serious stuff.
He
reinterprets all the Catechisms to create a rupture with the Catechism
of Pope Pius X which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church
for salvation.He can choose to interpret the Catechisms rationally if he wants to.
The Catechisms now contradict themselves and the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors. This is a doctrinal mess.
All this is possible for the two popes and the CDF since they interpret BOD, BOB and I.I as exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. So they assume that the Holy Office 1949 was correct and Fr. Leonard Feeney was wrong.
They
also reinterpret Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being non
hypothetical in the present times and so the Council emerges as a
rupture with the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and traditional EENS. So there is a rupture, a schism with the past popes on EENS.
This is all heresy and schism. Offering Mass in Italian is a sacrilege.Heresy is an impediment. Schism with the past popes based on bad reasoning, is also an impediment to offering Holy Mass for a priest.
This
has been the teaching of the Catholic Church for centuries and it is
not a personal opinion. I am only calling attention to what the Church
has taught inspired by the Holy Spirit and which was accepted as Magisterium by Catholics.
These
points are not covered in the Open Letter to the Bishops since the
signatories also interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational
premise and inference. For them there are objective exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. This is also the mistake made in general by the cardinals and bishops in ignorance.
Pope
Francis is still the pope for me even though he is in heresy like most
of the cardinals and bishops and the signatories of the Open Letter to
the Bishops. They are Cushingites and not Feeneyites. I am a Feeneyite
and not a Cushingite. Cushingism is like the past- Aryan heresy. It has
spread throughout the Church. It is the precise cause of the hermeneutic
of rupture in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and other
Magisterial documents.It creates heresy.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment