The Catholic Church in Vatican Council II is saying that every one needs to be a member of the Church with faith and baptism to avoid Hell (AG 7). It is not just me saying this. The Council does not mention any exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Since possibilities and hypothetical cases cannot be objective examples of salvation outside the Church.There are no literal exceptions to the dogmatic teaching on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.Vatican Council II is a magisterial document and it is obligatory for all to accept it and interpret it rationally, when it affirms de fide teachings on the Church having exclusive salvation and the need for all to be members to avoid Hell.
It does not mention any particular member of a religion going to Hell, but it says all need faith and baptism for salvation (AG 7). All.Most people die without it including members of other religions.
So when the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, N.H, say outside the Church there is no salvation they are referring to Vatican Council II.
They mean Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) and not Vatican Council II (Cushingite).With Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) there are no for an against passages to EENS but only for and neutral passages to EENS.
I repeat, with Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) there are only for and neutral passages to EENS. The red passages do not contradict the blue passages, since the red passages are neutral, with Vatican Council II( Feeneyite).
With Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) concepts the red passages are exceptions to the blue passages.
With Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) concepts the red passages are exceptions to the blue passages.
Most Catholics interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism.This can be changed.Catholics need to be shown the difference between the two interpretations.So that they can choose the rational and traditional one.
The Council then will not be a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors , Athanasius Creed and past Catechisms on ecumenism and non Christian religions There can be good things in other religions and the Holy Spirit may choose to be present in some ways but the religions are not paths to salvation.There is only one way to go to Heaven, according to Vatican Council II, it is Jesus in his Mystical Body the Catholic Church, whose teachings on faith and morals and its Sacraments, do not change.
The Church is the pearl of great price, it is the treasure a man finds in a field and sells all to have it.The Catholic Church is the narrow road that leads to Heaven and most people do not take it.
Jesus cannot be separated from the Church and the Church cannot be separated from the Kingdom of God ( Dominus Iesus).
Fr. Leonard Feeney would say ,it is reported, 'You are either a Catholic or damned'. For him literally there were no cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).
There are no personally known cases of being saved in invincible ignorance, Brother Andre Marie MICM, wrote in his correspondence with the Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).
So the Catechism of the Catholic Church(847-848-invincible ignorance) does not contradict the same Catechism which says the Church is like the Ark of Noah in which all need to enter to be saved from the Flood; to be saved from damnation(CCC 845).God wants all people to be united in the Catholic Church(CCC 845). All need faith and baptism for salvation states states the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846(No Salvation Outside the Church) citing Ad Gentes 7.
Invincible ignorance is not an exception to EENS. There are no known cases of being saved in ignorance, I repeat.
All the natives in the Americas before Columbus, before the missionaries went there were oriented to Hell.Even today all the pagans are Hell-bound. All the people in Goa, India were oriented to Hell, before St. Francis Xavier went then and preached and baptised.
This is Vatican Council II( Feeneyite). This is the Conciliar Church.It is Feeneyite.It is Feeneyite according to the text and interpretation of the Council and not according to the ecclesiastics at the Vatican who have preserved the Cushingite narrative since 1965 and now are being challenged.
Cardinal Richard Cushing was active at Vatican and the theology is largely Cushingite. It is the new theology based upon personally known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I.However in a perculiar way Vatican Council II, with the new theology, can be interpreted with Feeneyism. This is when what is invisible is not assumed to be visible, what is subjective is not mistaken as being objective and what is implicit and known only to God is not projected as being explicit for us human beings.
So there is no pre and past Vatican Council II theology for a Feeneyite and the Feeneyites include St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine. The hermeneutic of continuity is created with Cushingism.
The Jesuit Fr.Leonard Feeney is supported by Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) on EENS. Pope Francis can confirm this. He can also clarify that Vatican Council II( Cushingite) has a mistake.-Lionel Andrades
Jesus cannot be separated from the Church and the Church cannot be separated from the Kingdom of God ( Dominus Iesus).
Fr. Leonard Feeney would say ,it is reported, 'You are either a Catholic or damned'. For him literally there were no cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).
There are no personally known cases of being saved in invincible ignorance, Brother Andre Marie MICM, wrote in his correspondence with the Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).
So the Catechism of the Catholic Church(847-848-invincible ignorance) does not contradict the same Catechism which says the Church is like the Ark of Noah in which all need to enter to be saved from the Flood; to be saved from damnation(CCC 845).God wants all people to be united in the Catholic Church(CCC 845). All need faith and baptism for salvation states states the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846(No Salvation Outside the Church) citing Ad Gentes 7.
Invincible ignorance is not an exception to EENS. There are no known cases of being saved in ignorance, I repeat.
All the natives in the Americas before Columbus, before the missionaries went there were oriented to Hell.Even today all the pagans are Hell-bound. All the people in Goa, India were oriented to Hell, before St. Francis Xavier went then and preached and baptised.
This is Vatican Council II( Feeneyite). This is the Conciliar Church.It is Feeneyite.It is Feeneyite according to the text and interpretation of the Council and not according to the ecclesiastics at the Vatican who have preserved the Cushingite narrative since 1965 and now are being challenged.
Cardinal Richard Cushing was active at Vatican and the theology is largely Cushingite. It is the new theology based upon personally known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I.However in a perculiar way Vatican Council II, with the new theology, can be interpreted with Feeneyism. This is when what is invisible is not assumed to be visible, what is subjective is not mistaken as being objective and what is implicit and known only to God is not projected as being explicit for us human beings.
So there is no pre and past Vatican Council II theology for a Feeneyite and the Feeneyites include St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine. The hermeneutic of continuity is created with Cushingism.
The Jesuit Fr.Leonard Feeney is supported by Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) on EENS. Pope Francis can confirm this. He can also clarify that Vatican Council II( Cushingite) has a mistake.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment