Where are the fairies for them to be exceptions to EENS ?

 

Joseph Shaw, John Lamont, Thomas Pink and John Rao will be speaking  at the traditionalist Summer Conference this year.None of them have commented onthe Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) asking the traditionalist Brother Andre Marie MICM, to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 847-848 on invincible ignorance) as a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

Yet this is the lie Shaw, Lamont, Pink and Rao must proclaim to maintain their teaching career, according to the bishops.

They also kept silent in March 2018 when Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, told an Associated Press correspondent at the Placquet Deo Press Conference, that Lumen Gentium 8 was an exception to the past exclusive ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

Brother Andre Marie informed the CDF that there are no personally known cases of being saved in invincible ignorance and if any one was saved as such he or she would only be known to God.

Possibilities are not concrete exceptions to EENS.

Brother Andre Marie was affirming EENS like the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.

These traditionalists professors deny EENS according to the Magisterium of the 16th century just like the present two popes.

The Latin Mass in England does not have the ecclesiology ( understanding faith and salvation and Church) as that of the Traditional Latin Mass in the 16th century.

How can LG 16( invincible ignorance) contradict Feeneyite EENS? How can CCC 847-848 be an exception  to the 16th century understanding of EENS?

Can Lamont, Shaw, Pink and Rao see ghaosts in England. Where are the fairies for them to be exceptions to EENS ?

-Lionel Andrades