Traditionalist professors in England interpret Vatican Council II and EENS like the Westminster new programs on mission and catechesis

 

Professors Joseph Shaw, Thomas Pink, Dr. John Rao and others in Britain like the Westminster diocese choose to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and ignore a rational interpretation, which would project the Council as being in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS.Like the liberal Professor Gavin D'Costa they choose to project BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to known people saved outside the Church. Then they choose to project LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as also referring to physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church and so they become exceptions to 16th century EENS.

This is also how the Diocese of Westminster interprets Vatican Council II and EENS in their new mission and catechesis programs.

Joseph Shaw and the Latin Mass Societies in England go along with the error as if this was the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church over the centuries.Similarly Thomas Pink and John Rao do not point out that mixing up what is implicit as being explicit and what is invisible as being visible to create a new, non traditional conclusion, was not the interpretation at the Traditional Latin Mass over the centuries. This does not even have to be the ecclesiology at Mass in the vernacular.

The Knights of Malta have prohibited the Traditional Latin Mass since many of the traditionalists interpret Vatican Council II, with the irrationality and then reject the Council.They do not know that the fault does not lie with Vatican Council II but with the irrational premise and inference they use to interpret the Council.So if Vatican Council II was interpreted without the false premise then the Council would support the past ecclesiology associated with the Tridentine Right Mass.

Presently Cardinal Raymond Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider offer the Traditional Latin Mass with the New Theology and the New Ecclesiology.This is the result of their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, which is the same for the Grand Master of the Knights of Malta.  

I have mentioned in a previous post that all the popes before Pius XII supported Fr. Leonard Feeney on EENS, when the small 't'( tradition, with their being exceptions to EENS) is assumed to be the big 'T'( Tradition over the centuries).

Over the centuries, the popes and saints affirmed the big 'T', Tradition, with there being no exceptions to EENS.BOD, BOB and I.I were not seen as exceptions to EENS for them.

For signatories of the Declaration of Truths and the Catholics professors in England, there is only the small 't'.So they affirm the New Theology which is based upon BOD, BOB and I.I being objective exceptions to EENS.

-Lionel Andrades