Bishop Peter Libasci will not place the Doctrinal Statement of Brother Andre Marie MICM on the diocese website and respond to it.Since the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are Cushingite for him.They are Feeneyite for the St. Benedict Center.

Bishop Peter Libasci will not place the Doctrinal Statement of Brother Andre Marie MICM on the diocese website and respond to it.Since the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are Cushingite for him.They are Feeneyite for the St. Benedict Center.

Extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) is Cushingite for Bishop Libasci and it is Feeneyite for the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Vatican Council II is Cushingite for him . It is Feeneyite for Brother Andre Marie.

The Creeds and Catechisms are heretically Cushingite for Bishop Libasci. They are not Cushingite,  for Brother Andre Marie.He does not use the false premise.

The popes over the centuries , with BOD, BOB and I.I, referred to invisible cases.They were Feeneyite.They are Feeneyite for Brother Andre Marie.For Bishop Libasci they are Cushingites. So the popes are projected as contradicting Fr. Leonard Feeney.

The popes from Paul VI  were Cushingite  and this was their mistake.Since Cushingism is irrational. It creates heresy and a rupture with Tradition.

The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 was Cushingite in its second half and Feeneyite in the first part.The second part would be rejected by Brother Andre Marie.

Bishop Libasci wants Brother Andre Marie to accept the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II of the popes from Paul VI, while he will not affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism, as does Brother Andre Marie.

So he does not place the St.Benedict Center Doctrinal Statement on the diocese website to clarify his position on EENS and Vatican Council II.

-Lionel Andrades