It is a mortal sin of faith for Bishop Steven J.Lopes and the ecclesiastics at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) to reject the Athanasius which says outside the Church there is no salvation.They are automatically excommunicated.
To interpret invincible ignorance as referring to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church and then postulate this as an exception to the Athanasius Creed, is a mortal sin of faith. It is public heresy.
Fr. Vaughn Treco was not obliged to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as referring to known examples of salvation outside the Church.This was the public heresy of Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the CDF at the Plaquet Deo Press Conference on March 1,2018.He made a direct attack on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).He pretended that Lumen Gentium 8 referred to known people saved outside the Church.
Fr.Vaught Treco like Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was correct. Vatican Council II interpreted with hypothetical cases assumed to be objective and practical examples of salvation outside the Church and so exceptions to EENS, is irrational, deceptive and heretical.
Bishop Steven Lopes is not accepting Vatican Council II with LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc being only theoretical cases in 2019 and so they are not exceptions of the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return. He is not being excommunicatd by complicit and ideological CDF and instead is supported.
He was allowed to study theology at the Gregorian Pontifical University since he did not say that the Holy Office (CDF) made an objective error in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case and the same mistake as repeated at Vatican Council II.
If he expressed the truth the Vatican and the Left would not allow him to receive a doctorate in theology.
May be Fr. Vaugh Treco did not know how Vatican Council II can be interpeted without the error of the liberal theologians Rahner and Ratzinger.
May be Bishop Steven Lopes knows that he can interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise and inference but if does do so he would be removed like Fr. Carlos Eugenio Irarrázaval Errazuriz auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese of Santiago, who made statements opposed by the Jewish Left.
So the bishop does not interpret Vatican Council II without the irrationality and has excommunicated Fr. Vaughn Treco.-Lionel Andrades
So the bishop does not interpret Vatican Council II without the irrationality and has excommunicated Fr. Vaughn Treco.-Lionel Andrades
He has been ‘excommunicated’ for the ‘crime’ of Catholicism!
~ An Old Curmudgeon
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment