Dietrich and Alice von Hildebrand, Paolo Pascualucci, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Roberto dei Mattei,Walter Matt, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, Christopher Ferrara, Mons. Ignacio Barreiro and others were all interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism.So this line of traditionalist writers had it wrong on the Council.Their premise was wrong and so their conclusion was wrong.
Michael Davies, Atila Sinke Guimares, John Vennari interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise. So there was an artificial rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
The SSPX bishops too made their original mistake on the Fr. Leonard Feeney case and then superficially read Vatican Council II.Their apostolate is based on Cushingism.
They accepted the irrationality in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) and then applied it to Vatican Council II.They did not like the conclusion which obviously was heretical.So they rejected the Council. They were not aware of the false premise, which is the basis of Cushingism.Neither could they distinguish between Vatican Council with and without the premise, Vatican Council II Cushingite or Feeneyite.
Instead they carried on writing books criticizing Vatican Council, interpreted with the false premise and inference.
The popes from Paul VI to Francis and the present ecclesiastics at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith made the same mistake. They used the same false premise to interpret the Council.
For them the red is an exception to the blue.1
I do not make the same mistake since I am aware of the distinction between Cushingism and Feeneyism.The Council is traditional for me.-Lionel Andrades
1
FROM THE RIGHT HAND BAR.CLICK TO ACCESS
They accepted the irrationality in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) and then applied it to Vatican Council II.They did not like the conclusion which obviously was heretical.So they rejected the Council. They were not aware of the false premise, which is the basis of Cushingism.Neither could they distinguish between Vatican Council with and without the premise, Vatican Council II Cushingite or Feeneyite.
Instead they carried on writing books criticizing Vatican Council, interpreted with the false premise and inference.
The popes from Paul VI to Francis and the present ecclesiastics at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith made the same mistake. They used the same false premise to interpret the Council.
For them the red is an exception to the blue.1
I do not make the same mistake since I am aware of the distinction between Cushingism and Feeneyism.The Council is traditional for me.-Lionel Andrades
1
FROM THE RIGHT HAND BAR.CLICK TO ACCESS
- Red is an exception to the blue-Bologna School/ Fr.John Zuhlsdorf(1)
- Red is not an exception to the blue - Proclamation (2)
- Red is not an exception to the blue - profances Holy Mass (1)
- Red is not an exception to the blue :CCC 846-848 (4)
- Red not an exception to blue mapping(1)
JULY 28, 2019
Roberto dei Mattei will not announce that he made a mistake on Vatican Council II all these years
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/roberto-dei-mattei-will-not-announce.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment