Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so do not correct the error made by Pope Paul VI.
They also interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so do not correct the error made by Pope John XXIII who interpreted extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with Cushingism.
He wrongly assumed there were known cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I). He wrongly then presumed that these were practical exceptions to the traditional teaching on the Churh having an exclusiveness in salvation. Similarly Pope Paul VI wrongly assumed that BOD, BOB and I.I referred to known people saved outside the Church, without faith and baptism.So the dogma EENS was made obsolete.
He wrongly assumed there were known cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I). He wrongly then presumed that these were practical exceptions to the traditional teaching on the Churh having an exclusiveness in salvation. Similarly Pope Paul VI wrongly assumed that BOD, BOB and I.I referred to known people saved outside the Church, without faith and baptism.So the dogma EENS was made obsolete.
When they assumed hypothetical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I were exceptions to EENS I call it Cushingism.
When I know that hypothetical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are not practical exceptions to EENS I call it Feeneyism.
It was with Cushingism that Pope Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II. He wrongly assumed that hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc were objective exceptions to the past exclusive ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.He had a choice. He could have interpreted Vatican Council II and EENS with Feeneyism, just as I do.
Today Masimo Faggioli, Michael Sean Winters interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and justify so many changes in the Church.
-Lionel Andrades
AUGUST 22, 2019
Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so do not correct the error made by Pope Paul VI. They also interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so do not correct the error made by Pope John XXIII
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/massimo-faggioli-and-michael-sean.html
AUGUST 22, 2019
Massimo Faggioli, Michael Sean Winters and the other Cushingites support heresy when they reject the Athanasius Creed , change the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, change the interpretation of Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms and reject traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS ) based upon rational Feeneyism.They are in a general rupture with the past Magisterium, when they use Cushingism as a philosophy and theology
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/massimo-faggioli-michael-sean-winters.html
AUGUST 22, 2019
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment