Presently the popes, the CDF and the Vatican Curia support the schism from the Left

A schism from the Left is still a schism. They have put aside the Athanasius Creed, changed the interpretation of the Nicene  and Apostles  Creed, changed the interpretation of Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms, rejected the Syllabus of Errors, past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return and still expect Catholics to accept mortal sins of faith.

This is a schism with the popes and Magisterium of the past.

In March 2016 Pope Benedict confirmed that he did not interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) like the missionaries in the 16th century. He also interpreted Vatican Council II in LG 16, GS 22 etc, referring to known non Catholics saved outside the Church. So they were objective exceptions to the dogma EENS according to the 16th century Magisterium.He was using the false premise.1

 He also indicated in the Avvenire interview that with his interpretation of Vatican Council II , there was no need for mission any more.
 This is a schism with the popes and Magisterium of the past.2

Now to end this schism Catholics need to see that the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) are not exceptions to EENS .Neither are LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc  exceptions to 16th century EENS.So the Church still teaches exclusive salvation. The Catholic Church affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.

Presently the popes, the CDF and the Vatican Curia support the schism from the Left.-Lionel Andrades


 1

Their false premise is:-

1. Invisible people are visible.

2.Unknown case of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known.

3.The unknown case of the catechumen who desired the baptism of water but dies before he received it and is saved, is a personally known person.

4.There is known salvation outside the Catholic Church for us human beings.

5.We can see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water.

6.We can physically see non Catholics in Heaven and on earth who are saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).

7.There are non Catholics who are dead- men visible and walking  who are saved outside the Church.

8.There are known people in invincible ignorance through no fault of their own, who are saved.

9.There are some Anglicans and Protestants whom we know who are going to Heaven even though they are outside the Catholic Church.

10.There are some non Catholics whom we know, who are dead, and now are in Heaven, even though they were not Catholic.


 2
 So with the false premise there are objective exceptions to EENS etc:-

1. The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is contradicted.

2. The Nicene Creed in which we say, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' over the centuries referred  to only one known baptism, the baptism of water.The baptism of desire etc cannot be given to someone like the baptism of water.But now the understanding is ' I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( desire,blood and ignorance) and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'.

3. The Apostles Creed says ' we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church'. Over the centuries it was understood that the Holy Spirit guided the Catholic Church and taught that there was no salvation outside the Church.Now  unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, and LG 8, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are assumd to be objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

4.In the past three Church Councils defined the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in the extraordinary Magisterium .It was an 'infallible teaching' for Pope Pius X( Letter of the Holy Offie 1949).Now it is obsolete with their being alleged known salvation outside the Church.
5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.

6.With the false premise the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradict itself. It affirms the strict interpretation of EENS while invincible invincible ignorance is intepreted as referring to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Chuch.Invincible ignorance is not seen as a hypothetical case only.

7.Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus, Ecclesia in Asia, Balamand Declaration  etc were all written upholding the false premise. They did not support exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. So in a subtle way they contradicted EENS(Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed etc. They did not support the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.They are Christological without the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology. It's Christ without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.
8. Traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is rejected. Since with the false premise, there is salvation outside the Church.
9.Inter faith marriages which are not Sacraments are common held.It is no more adultery. Since the non Catholic spouse could be saved outside the Church it is assumed. A posibility which could only be known to God is assumed to be a practical exception to EENS and a literally known case of salvation outside the Church in a personal case.
10. There is a new heretical ecclesiology at Holy Mass in all the rites and liturgies. The Latin Mass today does not have the same exclusivist ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century.