Revocation of Fr.Vaughn Treco's excommunication

Fr. Vaughn Treco was really excommunicated for not accepting Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) and his bishop, Bishop Steven J.Lopes of the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter was not excommunicated for rejecting the Creeds and Catechisms and Vatican Council II interpreted with Feeneyism.
Bishop Lopes did not interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus with rational Feeneyism.
He  has heretically put aside the Athansius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors, the Apostles and Nicene Creed interpreted with Feeneyism.He has also made Vatican Council II and the Catechisms interpreted with Feeneyism obsolete. So there is no continuity with Tradition.

It was a political and ideological excommunication of Fr.Treco and Catholics are not calling upon Lopes to affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) without a break with Catholic Tradition( Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed, EENS etc).

They should be placing advertisements in the media in support of Fr. Treco explaining the difference between Feeneyism and Cushingism.The bishop irrationally and intentionally interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingite philosophy and theology.So he created an artificial rupture with Catholic traditional teachings especially exclusive salvation and an ecumenism of return.

The bishop is unethical and deceptive and is legally getting away with it.

It is the same in the case of Fr. Alexandro M. Minutella in the Archdiocese of Palermo, Italy.There the bishop Corrado Lorefice drives a cycle within the church for the media.The two bishops are following the Left and the Masons.They reject the past Magisterium of the Church.

It is Bishop Steven Lopes who should have been excommunicated and not Fr. Vaughn Treco.Bishop Lopes rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with a Cushingite interpretation of Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades