Bishop Frank J. Caggiano at the Catholic Answers Conference this month will officially support irrationality and heresy and the common schism with the past popes.He is supported by the Left, the USCCB and the CDF.He will acknowledge this charge.He will not deny it. Since if he denied it he would have to affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and this would be Anti Semitic etc, for the non Christians who control theology in the Catholic Church.
For me Lumen Gentium 8 etc would refer to invisible and personally unknown non Catholics saved outside the Church in Sept 2019.For him it is the opposite.LG 8 is an exception to EENS. So it is a known non Catholic who is saved without faith and baptism(AG 7,LG 14). It is not someone invisible. This is the wrong reasoning of the popes from Paul VI to Francis.The schismatic popes.
This is the official philosophy and theology of the Diocese of Bridgeport, Connecticut, USA.
Instead the Diocese of Bridgeport must let Catholics know that they can interpret magisterial documents with Feeneyism or Cushingism and Cushingism is irrational.
Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known
exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit
cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Cushingism: It
is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there
are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need
for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of
desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle
hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
The Diocese
of Bridgeport must let school children know that they can interpret the
Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism or Cushingism.It does
not have to be only Cushingism, which is now obligatory in the diocese.
Catholic
school children in religion/catechism classes must be told that the
Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II can be
interpreted with Cushingism( as is being done now) or Feeneyism and the conclusion would be different.
In the diocese it is the bishop who needs to
interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism and then
the lay people can do the same in their study groups.
In
these terms defined which follow, the diocese needs to choose Feeneyism
for the interpretation of magisterial documents including the Catechism
of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II.
Baptism of Desire (Feeneyite): It refers to the hypothetical case of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is an invisible case in our reality it is not relevant to the dogma EENS.
Baptism of Desire (Cushingite): It
refers to the known case of a catechumen who desires the baptism of
water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is a
visible case or the SSPX it is relevant to the dogma EENS.
Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite): This
refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the
baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.
Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite): This
refers to the explicit case of someone allegedly saved without the
baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since
it is an exception to the dogma EENS it is assumed to be objectively
known in particular cases.This reasoning is irrational.
Council of Florence: One
of the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS.It did not mention
any exceptions.It did not mention the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.
Liberal theologians: They
reinterpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible
ignorance, as objective cases, known in the present times.They use Cushingism.
Vatican Council II (Cushingite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS.
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in
the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the
Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed (
Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the
King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and
State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell).
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston: It
assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times. So
it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the
traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard
Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the
baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The
Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant to EENs.From the second
part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.It was Cushingite.
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( Feeneyite). It means accepting the Letter as Feeneyite based on the first part,only .It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.The traditional interpretatiion of the dogma EENS does not mention any exceptions.
Letter of the Holy Office ( Cushingite). It
is based on the second part of the Letter.It rejects the traditional
interpretation of EENS. Since it considers the baptism of desire (
Cushingite-explicit) and being saved in invincible ignorance (
Cushingite-explicit cases) as being exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).It
worngly assumes hypothetical cases are objectively visible and so they
are exceptions to the first part of the Letter.
Baltimore Catechism: It
assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who
dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism
of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In
other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible
and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it
like the baptism of water.The Baltimore Catechism is accepted with the confusion.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.
Catechism of Pope X: It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.
Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) ; It
says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means
there are more than three known baptisms. They are water, blood, desire,
seeds of the Word etc.This is a Cushingite interpretation.
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.It is Feeneyite.
New Theology: It
refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical
cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma
EENS.With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church
changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with
Tradition.It's basis is Cushingism.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite): .It
refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto
convert into the Church in the present times, since there are
exceptions.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Feeneyite): It refers
to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.There are no
known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith
and baptism, to avoid Hell.
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC
1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is
based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS(
Feeneyite).
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite): CCC
1257 does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since there
are no known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for
salvation. There are no known exceptions, since God is not limited to
the Sacraments.
When
CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the
Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the dogmatic teaching on all needin
to formally enter the Church. CCC 846 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7
which states all need faith and baptism for salvation.
Council of Trent : A Feeneyite does
not separate the baptism of water from the baptism of desire.The
baptism of desire will be followed by the baptism of water.
Council of Trent : A Cushingite separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water.
CANON LAW
CANON LAW
Bishop
Caggiano and his Curia in the diocese are in heresy and schism and
Canon Law must apply to them. They administer the Sacraments in
sacrilege and need to rectify the scandal in public.They have been
informed about this in the past.So they know.
1.They have rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)
by deceptively assuming unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD),
baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance)I.I) are
known exceptions in the present times (1965-2019), to the dogma EENS. So
the de fide teaching on EENS approved by three Church Councils
is obsolete for them.This is heresy.It is also schism with the past
popes on EENS.They also reject Vatican Council II(AG 7) which supports
the strict interpretation of EENS, when LG 8, LG 16, UR 3 etc are
interpreted as being only hypothetical cases.
3.Since
BOD,BOB and I.I are literal exceptions to EENS for those holding
juridical officies according to Canon Law in the diocese,
they have also rejected the Athanasius Creed which says outside the
Church there is no salvation.According to Canon Law this is a violation
and an offence.Eligibility for the juridical position ends.A juridical
person must affirm all the teachings of the Catholic Church.So in the
diocese of Bridgeport like the diocese of Madison, and other U.S dioceses, they need to resign or end the scandal.
4.Since
BOD,BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS, implying outside the Church
there is known salvation, for the Rectors, Superiors, Curia officials,
Canonists, Catechists and school principals, they interpret all the
Catechisms and Vatican Council II irrationally.This is done even when a rational option exists and they have been informed . So
the Catechisms and Vatican Council II for them, are not in harmony with
the strict interpretation of EENS, as it was known to the Magisterium
in the 16th century. There is also a rupture with the past
ecclesiology, which held that salvation is exclusive and all need to be
members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.It is a rupture with the
Syllabus of Errors, on an ecumenism of return since now there is known
salvation outside the Church.There is a break with traditional Mission,
based on no known salvation outside the Church.The family and marriages
are hit since now inter-faith marriages are possible since there is
alleged known salvation outside the Church.A non Catholic spouse it is
assumed will be saved .
The bishop and the juridical persons in the diocese commit a
mortal sin of faith.They must end the scandal in public before they
administer the Sacraments and offer Holy Mass.
FALSE ECCLESIOLOGY AND FALSE CHRISTOLOGY
FALSE ECCLESIOLOGY AND FALSE CHRISTOLOGY
There
are no known exceptions to their false ecclesiology and also there are
no known exceptions to traditional Christology and salvation theology.
We
do not know of any one saved by Jesus outside the visible boundaries of
the Catholic Church.Similarly if someone theoretically, hypothetically,
for them, is assumed to be saved outside the Church it would really
only be known to God.For us humans there is no extraordinary means of
salvation. The ordinary means of salvation is faith and baptism in the
Catholic Church(AG 7,LG 14).
September 9, 2019
The Bishop of Bridgeport, Connecticut, USA and apologists of Catholic Answers at their annual conference in San Diego this month, will knowingly interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise; with Cushingite philosophy and theology, to create an artificial rupture with Tradition; the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors, Oath Against Modernism and the Creeds and Catechisms.They will wrongly interpret Lumen Gentium as a rupture with Feeneyite EENS
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-bishop-of-bridgeport-connecticut.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment