Fr.Jean Marie Gleize, Fr.Matthias Gaudron,Fr. Francois Laisney and other priests and professors of theology of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) teach the same mistake in ecclesiology made by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, Cardinal Marc Ouelett,Cardinal Walter Kasper and Archbishop Rino Fisichella .
Bishop Bernard Fellay is notorious.
The ecclesiology semesters at the SSPX seminaries and those of the pontifical universities and seminaries in Rome,use the same false reasoning.The SSPX rejects the conclusion while the pontifical universities and seminaries accept it.Both groups interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise. So there is a new ecclesiology, new theology, new ecumenism, new evangelisation etc for Pope Benedict and Pope Francis.
The SSPX is not aware of the mistake. They know Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition but they do not know the precise cause of the rupture.
Bishop Fellay accepted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO)which contradicts the Athanasius Creed .So he interpreted LG 16, UR 3, etc as exceptions to the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.The same mistake was made by Cardinal Ratzinger in his articles on ecclesiology.
So when Fr. Jean Marie Gleize teaches ecclesiology at the SSPX seminary in Econe, Switzerland, he is not aware that by omitting the false premise, the ecclesiology of Vatican Council II is traditional.
He was also not aware of this during the SSPX- Vatican talks, when he led the SSPX side and Cardinal Ladaria, that of the Vatican.-Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 23, 2019
A clarification needs to be issued by the Vatican
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/a-clarification-need-to-be-issued-by.html
SEPTEMBER 22, 2019
For Pope Benedict there is only a hermeneutic of rupture with Vatican Council II since he chooses to interpret the Council with the false premise and inference to change the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/for-pope-benedict-there-is-only.html
SEPTEMBER 22, 2019
Cardinals and bishops at the Synods, under the influence of Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. They assumed hypothetical and unknown cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc were objective examples of salvation outside the Church. So for them, like it was for Cardinal Ratzinger, the Syllabus of Errors had become obsolete. This is official modernism. The Oath Against Modernism is violated. Also the Oath of Office for religious and bishops, has become modernistic with the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzinger
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/cardinals-and-bishops-and-cardinals-at.html
SEPTEMBER 22, 2019
There is no unity with the apostles since Cardinal Ratzinger rejects exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church
SEPTEMBER 22, 2019
Cardinal Walter Kasper interprets Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being objective . What is invisible is visible.What is implicit is confused as being explicit.He mixed up what is subjective as being objective.In this way a rupture with the old ecclesiology and the rest of Tradition, is created.His books on ecclesiology with this error are recommended reading at Ecclesiology semesters at the pontifical universities . They are approved by Pope Benedict and now Pope Francis. In an article on Ecclesiology, Cardinal Marc Oulett,uses Cardinal Kasper's books in the reference
SEPTEMBER 22, 2019
Pope Benedict's article on ecclesiology is flawed since like Cardinal Kasper he projected what is hypothetical as being non hypothetical, invisible as visible, implicit as explicit and subjective as objective to create a rupture with Tradition and the past ecclesiology. The error is being followed by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) . They too interpret Lumen Gentium as contradicting Tradition; the past ecclesiology, the Syllabus of Errors etc. So the Athanasius Creed is made obsolete and the Nicene Creed changed. They probably knew their theology and ecclesiology is flawed but continue with the error for political reasons. It is unethical and deceptive and not Catholic
Pope Benedict's article on ecclesiology is flawed since like Cardinal Kasper he projected what is hypothetical as being non hypothetical, invisible as visible, implicit as explicit and subjective as objective to create a rupture with Tradition and the past ecclesiology. The error is being followed by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) . They too interpret Lumen Gentium as contradicting Tradition; the past ecclesiology, the Syllabus of Errors etc. So the Athanasius Creed is made obsolete and the Nicene Creed changed. They probably knew their theology and ecclesiology is flawed but continue with the error for political reasons. It is unethical and deceptive and not Catholic
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment