Outside the Catholic Church there is salvation for Roberto dei Mattei .This is the new theology. It is accepted by him.He interprets Magtisterial documents with this New Theology

 

As the authors of the article Maike Hickson and Mathew Cullinan Hoffman highlighted, the Bogotá document threatens to subvert or overturn the fundamental elements of Catholic Doctrine, sustaining that the Church does not have the “monopoly on salvation” and the pluralism and diversity of religions are expressions of a wise divine will; the non-Christian religions are able to bring “salvation” to people and the pagan religious traditions of the indigenous in the Amazon ought to be re-evaluated;...

 We are the sons and daughters of a Militant Church, which does not admit and include error, but combats error and defends the truth. A Church that wants to win souls and all of society for Christ.  A Church that separates itself from those, in the inside, who profess a different religion. A Church that we entrust to the Most Blessed Virgin Mary, so that with Her Angels She protects it in the upcoming decisive weeks.-Roberto dei Mattei,De Mattei: A Schismatic Synod on the Amazon?1

Roberto dei Mattei in this on Rorate Caeli and other reports, says outside the Church there is no salvation but he assumes that the baptism of desire (BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). It was the same with Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.

Mattei also interprets LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as being exceptions to 16th century EENS. It was the same with Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops.

So outside the Catholic Church there is salvation for him.This is the new theology. It is accepted by him.He interprets Magtisterial documents with this New Theology.

The old theology was outside the Church there is no salvation and BOD, BOB and I.I were not objective exceptions to EENS.

So today Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the old or new theology and he chooses the irrational and heretical one.He supports Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits and not Fr. Leonard Feeney.

 Like the present two popes he is in schism with the past popes over the centuries on EENS and exclusive salvation, the exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.EENS has exceptions for him.So he is a traditionalist who is not a Feeneyite like the traditionalists at the St. Benedict Center, USA.He is a Cushingite traditionalist and they are Feeneyite traditionalists.He attends the old Mass with the new theology and ecclesiology and Brother Andre Marie MICM, attends Mass with Vatican Council II not being exceptions to EENS and BOD, BOB and I.I not being exceptions to EENS. So there is only the old ecclesiology.

Roberto dei Mattei is in agreement with the popes since Paul VI  who interpreted EENS with BOD, BOB and I.I being exceptions. They followed the second part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, which contradicted the first part of LOHO.

Now if he interprets EENS with BOD, BOB and I.I not being exceptions to EENS, it would be considered Anti Semitic etc. So the EENS he refers to is Cushingite. It has exceptions. This is what he means by outside the Church there is no salvation. It is the same understanding of EENS held by the cardinals and bishops who will be there at the Amazon Synod.-Lionel Andrades

 

1

 https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2019/09/de-mattei-schismatic-synod-on-amazon.html#more