When Pope Francis referred to a schism the other day he did not mention that he is already in a schisn with the Church Fathers and the popes of the Middle Ages on de fide teachings . He is in a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) , the past exclusivist ecclesiology, the Nicene Creed, the Athanasius Creed , the Syllabus of Errors on EENS, the Catechism of Pope Pius X on EENS and ecumenism of return, the rational understanding of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance and the Oath Against Modernism. His interpretation of Vatican Council II is irrational modernist, heretical and schismatic.

When Pope Francis referred to a schism the other day he did not mention that he is already in a schisn with the Church Fathers and the popes of the Middle Ages on de fide teachings . He is in a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) , the past exclusivist ecclesiology, the Nicene Creed, the Athanasius Creed , the Syllabus of Errors on EENS, the Catechism of Pope Pius X on EENS and ecumenism of return, the rational understanding of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance and the Oath Against Modernism. His interpretation of Vatican Council II is irrational modernist, heretical and schismatic.

The schism is being enforced by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) and it has always been supported by Pope Benedict who wanted a hermeneutic of rupture  with Tradition.His survival depended upon it.

Meanwhile there are Leftist Anti Semitic and other laws which make  Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider  also follow the schism.They do not  speak about it. So no punitive action is taken against these obedient ecclesiastics.

Bishop Schneider and Prof. Robert Fastigii approved Ludwig Ott's Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma( Baronius Press) which overlooked the factual error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO).It  has de-railed theology in the Catholic Church and has contributed  to the silent schism with the past popes.

There are two interpretation of Vatican Council II one rational an the other irrational  and the whole Church is following the irrational one because of the LOHO error.

When cardinals and bishops interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with the past ecclesiology it is schism.

They use a false premise and inference  to create an artificial  and superficial rupture and this is ignored by the present two popes and the Left. This is schism.

-Lionel Andrades