Bishop Peter Libasci and the Chancellor want scientists in New Hampshire, to interpret Vatican Council II by violating Newton's Laws of physics.This is a credibility issue.For a doctor, engineer, lawyer or priest to confuse what is invisible as being being visible, even after being informed, indicates his sense of reality is different from the rest of mankind.

All the books available on Vatican Council II in the diocese of Manchester, USA have an error.They use irrational reasoning to reject  the traditional teaching on the Church having a superiority and exclusiveness in salvation and that in Heaven, there are only Catholics.Bishop Peter Libasci will not correct this mistake and neither will the professionals, associated with the diocese.

The books on Vatican Council II have a mistake and there is no clarification or correction from the Diocese of Manchester or the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.

This is important.Since the Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester and the CDF  wants the St. Benedict Center, N.H , to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). It is only then that they will the SBC legally accepted as Catholics and Prohibitions be lifted.This is expected of all Catholics in the diocese.

Catholic professionals in the diocese must inform Bishop Libasci  that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II do not refer to practical exceptions to EENS. Since they are only hypothetical cases.This is a credibility issue.For a doctor, engineer, lawyer or priest to confuse what is invisible as being being visible, even after being informed, indicates his sense of reality is different from the rest of mankind.

Bishop Peter Libasci and the Chancellor want scientists  in New Hampshire, to interpret Vatican Council II by violating Newton's Laws of physics.

The diocese discriminates on the basis of religion; religious beliefs.Those Catholics in the diocese who do not use a false premise and inference, to interpret Vatican Council II a rupture with the dogma EENS are labelled as legally not being Catholic.

Why should a Catholic scientist or engineer, in the diocese claim that unknown and invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance, the baptism of desire or baptism of blood are known and visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so they are literal exceptions to the traditional strict interpretation of EENS?

A Blue Mass was held recently by Bishop Libasci for Members of Law Enforcement, Firefighters,
and Emergency Medical Services, who interpret Vatican Council II with this irrationality.This is unprofessional for the police department and other professionals.

A policeman who claims LG 8, LG 16 etc refer to physical bodies in the present times(2019) is out of touch with reality.

Yet this is the reasoning of Bishop Libasci and the CDF expects the SBC to supports all this for canonical recognition, like other religious communities,  and to legally be called a Catholic.

SBC PATIENCE

I think the SBC must not take the issue to court.It is difficult when an irrational and unscientific bishop accuses  Catholics of legally not being Catholic and this is only because- they do not interpret EENS and Vatican Council II with the irrational reasoning.The irrational reasoning creates a break with the traditional teachings of the Church.

The SBC must wait.More people  understand the general mistake being made on Vatican Council II.

The scenario will change. This has now become a part of a broader issue - the interpretation of Vatican Council II in the diocese and by the CDF.

The bishop and the CDF will have to correct their irrational theological position.

Even though the SBC can challenge the bishop legally they should wait.This issue is no doubt a big cross for the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.-Lionel Andrades 

October 29, 2019

Brother Andre Marie MICM, has to violate the Principle of Non Contradiction and the laws of physics at the Newtonian level of matter, to be theologically acceptable for the CDF and Diocese of Manchester,USA.It is only then the Prohibitions 6 will be lifted against this Catholic religious community, the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, who are not sedevacantists and nor in schism with the past popes and saints on EENS or Vatican Council II. 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/brother-andre-marie-micm-has-to-violate.html

 

 

    

    

 

 

 

October 25, 2019

Fr. Brian Harrison, Joseph Shaw, John Salza, John Lamont, Thomas Pink and others cannot say all need to enter the Catholic Church as members for salvation and not only those who know about Jesus and the Church. They cannot say this since they wrongly assume BOD, BOB and I.I 1 are objective examples of salvation outside the Church. It is the same for Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, USA and his Chancellor.Their error comes from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston(LOHO) and the error was included in Vatican Council II. 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/fr-brian-harrison-joseph-shaw-john.html