Cardinals Muller ,Burke and Arinze interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise even after being informed. Bishop Schneider, Archbishop Bruno Forte and Bishop Marcello Semeraro do the same. They are all part of the Cushingite Conciliar Church.Cushingism as a philosophy and theology creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.

Cardinals Muller ,Burke and Arinze interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise  even after being informed. Bishop Schneider, Archbishop Bruno Forte and Bishop Marcello Semeraro do the same. They are all part of the Cushingite Conciliar Church.Cushingism as a philosophy and theology creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.

So they all interpret papal documents, the Creeds and Catechisms with Cushingism i.e they assume hypothetical cases are non hypothetical and objective non Catholics known in the present times.In this way they can be projected as exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.

In contrast Feeneyism refers to hypothetical cases just being hypothetical.So they cannot be objective exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.The Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors are not contradicted in real life with theoretical and hypothetical cases.

Archbishop Bruno Forte offers Mass in Italian and Bishop Schneider in Latin and their ecclesiology is the same. It is a rupture with the past. For them the Church is communion, Sacrament, people of God, mystery etc but not like the Ark of Noah that saves and in which all need to enter, with no exceptions.There are exceptions for them. Many.So they offer Mass in Italian and Latin and are part of the same Cushingite Conciliar Church.

There is no difference between the Novus Ordo and Latin Mass Church here. Irrespective of the liturgy, there ecclesiology is a break with the past ecclesiology.

-Lionel Andrades

https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php