Bishop Mark Pivarunas, like Bishop Donald Sanborn, is not responding to reports which state that they deceptively interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a rupture with Tradition. They know they do so and want to carry on with the deception

Bishop Mark Pivarunas, like Bishop Donald Sanborn, is not responding to reports which state that they deceptively interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a rupture with Tradition. They know they do so and want to carry on with the deception.-Lionel Andrades

October 12, 2019

Bishop Mark Pivarunas and Fr. Benedict Hughes of the Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae(CMRI) use a lie and deception to change the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and the Athanasius Creed and now that they are informed they will not admit the error and announce a change. 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/bishop-mark-pivarunas-and-fr-benedict.html

October 11, 2019

Fr.Benedict Hughes CMRI and Bishop Mark Pivarunas do not deny that they assume unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I as being known exceptions to Feneeyite EENS. They also do not deny that they assume hypothetical and theoretical cases referenced in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc as being literal and practical exceptions to EENS. So Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition for them and they have chosen sedevacantism. 

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/frbenedict-hughes-cmri-and-bishop-mark.html

October 15, 2019

There was a debate on Ecclesiology between Bishop Donald Sanborn and Prof. Robert Fastiggi and both of them interpreted Vatican Council II (LG 8 etc) as a rupture with Tradition( Syllabus of Errors, EENS etc).They confused invisible and unknown people as being known examples of salvation outside the Church. They confused unknown and hypothetical cases as being visible. 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/there-was-debate-on-ecclesiology.html