LG 8 etc refer
to hypothetical cases only in 2019. They are not real and known non
Catholics saved outside the Church.So Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Catholic Tradition as these deceptive authors would like us to believe. It is unethical to continue to have the books of Fr.Hans Kung sj available at the libraries, when he intentionally interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to conclude that Catholic Tradition has become obsolete with this Council.Similarly Cardinal Walter Kasper and others have been informed. The same error was made by Cardinal Ratzinger who is aware of the mistake, in his writings as cardinal and now as pope.
Lumen Gentium does not contradict
the past ecclesiology, LG 16 and GS 22 are not practical exceptions to
Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and there is nothing in
Unitatis Redintigratio to contradict an ecumenism of return.
Usually
the books and reports interpret Vatican Council II irrationally to
create an artifical rupture with Tradition, and they are made available for the readers in Rome.-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment