Too bad Sandro Magister, Edward Pentin and Diane Montagne interpret Vatican Council II like Cardinal Hummes, John Allen Jr and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre

Vatican Council II supports exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church so the Amazon Synod  Working Paper ( Instrumentum Laboris)  was false.The anonymous Coetus International missed out on this important point.They needed to quote Ad Gentes 7 which is ecclesiocentric. Instead they cited  Dominus Iesus  14 and 16  which is not ecclesiocentric in the text but only Christological.

They did not quote Ad Gentes 7  since perhaps they did not want to support Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This is common for the Lefebvrists and liberals.

At the Press Conferences Cardinal Hummes  could have been told  that Ad Gentes 7 affirms exclusive salvation  in the Church and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases only and so do not contradict Feeneyite EENS.Lumen Gentium is in harmony with the past ecclesiology.It supports EENS according to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
Too bad Sandro Magister, Edward Pentin and Diane Montagne interpret Vatican Council II like Cardinal Hummes, John Allen Jr and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. -Lionel Andrades