At the Angelicum and Gregorian University,Rome, they approve doctoral thesis only of students who interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.This is unethical and dishonest.

        
At the Angelicum and Gregorian University in Rome, they approve doctoral thesis  at the Faculty of Theology- but only of students/seminarians who interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.This is unethical and dishonest.

Thousands of students who were given academic degrees in theology, were not told that the Council was being interpreted by confusing what is implicit as explicit, unknown as known and visible as invisible to create a false premise and inference, resulting in a non traditional conclusion.

Popes, cardinals and bishops have participated in this exercise.Even in secular universities in Rome, like La Sapienza, which teach Church canon law, this deception has gone unnoticed.
 

Members of the judicial system in Italy, have received their Licentiate , Doctorate and other academic degrees  in theology, by interpreting Vatican Council II, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and other magisterial documents, with an irrational premise, to create a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, 16th century EENS, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed and Tradition in general.
 

Members of the Italian Judiciary also attend programs at these pontifical universities. Vatican Council II is not only interpreted  with a false premise at pontifical universities but also at state schools and Church educational institutions. So members of the judiciary have been influenced by the irrational interpretation of the Catechisms, Creeds and Vatican Council II.

They have studied Church Canon Law and Church History while interpreting Vatican Council II as having exceptions to EENS.So they imply that there are personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church, for there to be exceptions.
 

In reality an exception would only be in Heaven and unknown to us human beings on earth.Invisible people cannot be exceptions to the centuries -old teaching on the Catholic Church having an exclusiveness in salvation.

LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer only to hypothetical  cases. But this is not how the pontifical universities and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith interpret the Council.

Even Cardinal Raymond Burke, the former Prefect of the Apostolic Tribunal, the Signatura, in Rome, interpreted the Council with the false premise.

In present times, many vocations to the religious life were lost because of this unethical and bad policy on the interpretation of Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades







https://www.unigre.it/en/ua/faculties/missiology/