Edward Pentin's report on Bishop Rudolf Voderholzer, Bishop of Regensburg,Germany, was superficial.

Edward Pentin's report on Bishop Rudolf Voderholzer, Bishop of Regensburg,Germany, was superficial.1 Pentin  did not ask the bishop if the German bishops could make the invisible-visible, hypothetical-real, implicit-explicit distinction in the interpretation of Vatican Council II since then the  Council would be interpreted rationally.

This was not possible since Edward Pentin's Cushingite theology also confuses what is invisible as being visible, hypothetical as real and unknown as known.Pentin remains part of the general official deception.

He has to be deceptive on this issue.So he keeps his job as the National Catholic Register(NCR). He cannot tell the Bishop, "Your excellency, there are no known cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) in 2019. We do not know any one saved outside the Church with BOD, BOB and I.I this year. They are not visible.So why should the Church interpret  BOD,BOB and I.I as exceptions to the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) ? Why is there this obligation? "

Pentin would be identifying a mistake of the popes from Pius XII to Francis.

It is an objective mistake.

 It is a fact of life that there are no real BOD, BOB and I.I cases in our reality. But he cannot say it since the  Left would accuse him of being a neo-Feeneyite etc.

Edward Pentin  could have asked the German bishop , "How can unknown cases of lG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc, be known exceptions in 2019 to the past exclusivist ecclesiology? "

These questions would expose Pope Benedict's bad theology.

Pentin could have said, " As a rational Catholic I choose to interpret Lumen Gentium 8 etc as not being exceptions to EENS. What do you as a bishop have to say about this?"

But he did not  expose the general fake theology accepted by all bishops in line with Pope Benedict.

Edward Pentin was also silent at the time of Summorum Pontificum.It was bait for the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX). Pope Benedict wanted the SSPX to affirm Vatican Council II with the false premise.But Bishop Fellay did not give in. 

Even though the Lefebvrists are Cushingite, like Pentin and the German bishops, they use Cushingite reasoning and then reject the Council, unaware of the Feeneyite option.The German bishops accept the Council and use the same Cushingite ( there are objective exceptions) reasoning.

Edward Pentin probably  just had a dead line to meet and so he produced a superficial, politically correct, piece and his editor approved it because it was non controversial and supported the common deception-Lionel Andrades

1

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/german-bishop-urges-diocese-not-to-be-intimidated-as-synodal-path-begins

December 5, 2019

Cardinal Ratzinger's theology is the cause of the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.The interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church is heretical and it is now common throughout the Church. He did not correct Pope Paul VI when he interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.Instead he produced Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus, based upon the irrational philosophy and theology and then projected it as the Deposit of the Faith 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/cardinal-ratzingers-theology-is-cause.html